WalMart carried the game period. How many stores they chose to put them in was their decision as it was clearly stated that they would not remove them and they would remain in stores where there was a demand for the product. That certainly relates to WalMart determining what stores they chose to place the product in does it not?
Again, if you can find something that states there was any limit to the number of stores WalMart was willing to place the game in I am all ears.
If not then you can choose to belive that the deal was for a limited number of stores even though there is no information to support such a notion and I will continue to believe the deal was for any and all stores WalMart wanted to place them in.
Since there is no information out there that suggests WalMart limited these games to a set number of stores I refuse to read that into the information I read and you posted.
You can interpret the info any way you like. And so can I. But, again, unless you can provide something that supports your statement as being logical I have nothing left to say.
If you can show me anything that proves this was limited in scope and not nationwide I would accept it but I find nothing that suggests it was and the game was distributed to 10,000 retail locations according to the LFBG PR which would lead me to belive that more than WalMart was carrying this on a national level.
At one point in time Target was carrying the product and they had it in my area as well.
So, I am all ears. I interpret it as a national agreement with WalMart putting the game in any and all stores where there was demand. You feel as if it was a limited agreement that was for a set number of stores only. So we disagree right?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
