The most recent NI report was published for only one reason, right?
It was not intended to bring any new drilling up to compliance, right? Only meant to retract the validity of all historical resource calculations.
That is why there is a new report forthcoming. Why else would there be another report refrenced as "upated resource calculation" (June 3rd)? There is no other reason.
Keep in mind the company already knew that the historical reference was not NI compliant, since Archibald said so. That is why Scott listed the 12MT resource claculation from the 08-09 drill program at the PDAC, Not the historical calculation.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
