News Focus
News Focus
icon url

mike_m

02/25/05 5:08 PM

#363152 RE: Zeev Hed #363150

Re:<<It was a typo, 1750...>>

Typo's, can those be closely correlated to heart attacks?

icon url

punkle

02/25/05 10:37 PM

#363160 RE: Zeev Hed #363150

OT: Friday Night Humor:

http://home.swbell.net/kf5tv/voicemail.mp3

I haven't laughed this hard in a long, long, time.

This cell phone recording is hilarious! Enjoy!

Give the link a minute or two to load - it's worth the wait!


icon url

simple

02/26/05 8:07 AM

#363167 RE: Zeev Hed #363150

Panelists in FDA Drug Vote Tied to Makers

Yahoo (AP prss release) ^ / Feb 25, 2005

A study by the Center for Science in the Public Interest indicates that 10 of the 32 panel members had ties to either Pfizer Inc. or Merck & Co., ranging from consulting fees and speaking honoraria to research support.
The FDA issued a statement saying it screened members of the panel for conflicts of interest. "This transparent process requires the agency to carefully weigh any potential financial interest with the need for essential scientific expertise in order to protect and advance the public health," the agency said.
After three days of hearings on the drugs, known as Cox-2 inhibitors, the panel voted 31-1 to keep Pfizer's Celebrex on the market, 17-13 with 2 abstentions in favor of Pfizer's Bextra and 17-15 that Merck's Vioxx should be allowed back on sale.
Merck pulled Vioxx from the market Sept. 30 after heart problems were reported in some users. Similar questions were later raised about the other two drugs, prompting the FDA to call the advisory panel to look into the matter.
Since drug companies fund many studies it is not unusual for researchers to have ties to manufacturers, though some have questioned the practice.
The transcript, including the votes by the individual members of the panel, has not yet been posted by the FDA. However, a copy obtained by The Associated Press indicated that the 10 panel members in question voted 10-0 in favor of keeping Celebrex and Bextra available and 9-1 in favor of allowing Vioxx to be brought back onto the market.
Without those ballots the vote would have been 13-7 in favor of withdrawing Bextra and 14-8 to keep Vioxx off sale.
The industry ties of the panel members were first reported Friday by The New York Times.




icon url

simple

02/26/05 8:24 AM

#363168 RE: Zeev Hed #363150

Ticket agent suspected Atta but let him go

World Net Daily ^ / February 26, 2005

An airline ticket agent who checked in hijacker Mohamed Atta the morning of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks says he had a feeling he was looking at an Arab terrorist but gave in to political correctness and let him through.

Michael Tuohey, who works for U.S. Airways in Portland, Maine, told his story recently to Michael Smerconish, Philadelphia Daily News columnist and author of "Flying Blind: How Political Correctness Continues to Compromise Airline Safety Post-9/11."

Touhey now kicks himself for not acting, but Smerconish says if he had, the federal government probably would have punished him, noting three major airlines have been fined for alleged racial profiling.

The ticket agent, a veteran of 34 years now, says that at 5:43 a.m. on Sept. 11, 2001, two men wearing sport coats and ties approached his counter with just 17 minutes to spare before their flight to Boston.

He suspects they arrived late to take advantage of an airline system that was then "more concerned about on-time departure than effective screening."


Traveling with Atta was another 9-11 hijacker, Abdul Aziz al Omari.

Touhey told Smerconish:

"I looked up, and asked them the standard questions. The one guy was looking at me. It sent a chill through me. Something in my stomach churned. And subconsciously, I said to myself, 'If they don't look like Arab terrorists, nothing does.' " Then I gave myself a mental slap. In over 34 years, I had checked in thousands of Arab travelers, and I never thought this before. I said to myself, 'That's not nice to think. They are just two Arab businessmen.'"

And with that, Smerconish writes, Tuohey handed them their boarding passes.

Touhey thought it unusual that they each had a $2,500 first-class, one-way ticket to Los Angeles, via Boston, but the second warning flag was much more subjective.

"It was just the look on the one man's face, his eyes," Tuohey said of Atta.

The agent said Atta looked like a "walking corpse."

"He looked so angry. And he wouldn't look directly at me."


Omari, Touhey said, was "young and had a goofy smile, I can't believe he knew he was going to die that day."

After leaving Touhey's sight, Atta and Omari took off their coats and ties then went through the metal detectors.

The terrorists arrived in Boston at 6:45 a.m. where they joined Satam al Suqami, Wail al Shehri and Waleed al Shehri to board American Airlines Flight 11 for Los Angeles.

When Touhey received word the flight crashed into the World Trade Center's North Tower at 8:46 a.m., he thought is was an accident and was "sorry I had judged them."

But at 9:03 a.m., when United Airlines No. 175 hit the South Tower, Smerconish writes, Tuohey knew his first instinct had been correct.

"As soon as someone told me news of the second flight, I had a knot in my stomach."

But Smerconish points to the irony.

"While Michael Tuohey still second-guesses himself about his conduct on that day, the reality is that, had he taken action, he probably would have been punished by our government!"

In the aftermath of 9-11, American, United, Continental and Delta airlines were fined millions of dollars by the Department of Transportation for factoring race, gender, ethnicity, religion or appearance into security-screening decisions.


Tuohey said he was not aware of the fines until he read Smerconish's book.

"Here you have an industry in mortal peril, and you are fining them for political correctness?" Tuohey asked.



icon url

crazy bob

02/26/05 10:43 AM

#363183 RE: Zeev Hed #363150

Zeev steel is on fire. I bought MUSA after I compared it to TONS. They loaded up on inventory more than 1/2 billion and now steel prices are inflating. This will help their eps and margins this year. I think they can earn over 5 bucks. They earned 5.06 last year. Thats a pe of 4 when TONS has a pe of 12. They can pay off their debt at any time by reducing inventory so there is little risk imo. The only analyst that follows them thinks steel prices will fall. But even he raised his outlook yesterday. The chart is also bullish. Could this stock be son of tons or am I missing something. I value your opinion. Thanks for your time. BG

icon url

porter

02/26/05 2:04 PM

#363205 RE: Zeev Hed #363150

Z--

re: 1750

U're an e-waver at heart, afterall(WAVE 4 A-B-C).<GG>
It's possible that 1750 and a wee bit lower(high 1600's) will be Santa's gift to us in the 4th quarter.

"Is your better half going to buy DROOY at fifty centavos?"--
Alphonso Bedoya wants to know.

--P