i think the reason people bring ihub into it is because matt works for ihub and has a lot of power that was abused. moderators delete posts and control content on a board and the admins allow it and enable it. if somebody was on one of the boards that was being used by matt and his crew to pump a fraud questioning the information they were publishing it would not be allowed. since ihub chooses to take the stance that they are not regulators, but allows single sidedness on so many boards some here take the position that they are complicit in crimes perpetrated here.
imo it would be an interesting case to bring to court, especially given matts conduct and his current position here, but if i were in the doj/sec i would more likely just be watching the boards here as that could prove more fruitful in the long run.
but this has nothing to do with my post which was about the sociopathic line of reasoning that the victim is at fault and not the perpetrator of the crime,
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
