Replies to post #18530 on Empire Energy Corporation Intl. (fka EEGC)

[righty]

You about done mincing words?

I made it quite clear that it was an application, I referred to it as an application....the only instance of my referring to it as a patent was a result of my haste correcting you on mincing my words as to not being able to find any data referring to flare gas technology, when you INCORRECTLY MADE THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT
"Did you not state in an earlier post that the Report was "UNAVAILABLE.?" If so.....why would you state this? LOL
"

I never said a damn thing about any report not being available, and so I corrected your mistake by saying:

"LOL nope! never said that...what I did say was that "For months the insinuation has been that the patent was not able to be found."
"

well oh mercy me, now you are off howling in glee over that?

and trying to make assumptions about the actions of the applicant?

You have zero knowledge of what their intentions are or are not, sure educated guesswork can occur based on the limited filing info...but in no way can you make assumptions on where they are taking their tech from here.

Certainly when one takes the propensity to mince words into tofu then try and pass it off as steak into account, it becomes clear as a bell to see the modus operandi.

[Doc Metz]

You obviously have no knowledge about patent applications. Most if not all patent applications are rejected one or more times before they are approved. Initially the Patent Office does a very broad search and lists many previous patents as their reason for rejection. Actually, only a few of the patents that they reference are even remotely associated with the patent being applied for. As an example, if you applied for a patent for a seedless apple, some of the patents that would be quoted would be for seedless watermelons, seedless cucumbers, seedless oranges, etc. Your patent attorney then has to go back and, one by one, explain why the quoted patent does not apply. After several cycles, the rejections become fewer and fewer until specific wording of the patent applies only to your claim. To say that a patent is worthless because of an initial rejection is very naive.