News Focus
News Focus
icon url

dragonball

09/30/10 1:27 PM

#30808 RE: onemessageonly #30805

<That individual would in no way be concerned at this given stage. >

Now you are learning OMO. Go OMO! You have potential to be a great investor.

Keep up the good work.

As this pirate said long time ago. If you invest in LBSR, OMO is the best pirate-like individual to make good investment advise.

However,

The pirate noted to load as much under .05. Had like an entire day.

Now I don't know when we will see .05.

I'm back at $5 million shares again from recent reload of .04 and .045 AARGG!!!!!

And I had lots of profit to reinvest in our Other MULTI Baggars Stocks.

GO LBSR!!

Keep up the good work OMO.
icon url

StealthSwimmer

09/30/10 2:28 PM

#30819 RE: onemessageonly #30805

http://www.petroleumnews.com/mnarch/04-38-1.html

Nothing major, the FMM / PLP JV has already been discussed, but this did catch my attention as it mentions our agreement with NAK at the bottom:


In July Northern Dynasty bought 60.7 square kilometers, or 23.4 square miles, of Liberty Star Uranium & Metal Corp.’s Big Chunk and Bonanza Hills properties. Big Chunk is adjacent to the north border of the Pebble property and Big Chunk is a high-grade gold prospect located about 40 miles, or 64 kilometers, northeast of Big Chunk. The purchase represents about 13 percent of the properties and Northern Dynasty has the option, subject to signing a definitive agreement, to earn 60 percent in the remaining lands.

In order to keep these claims in good standing, Northern Dynasty completed a small exploration program that included an airborne ZTEM survey.

The Pebble Partnership is currently considering exercising its right to acquire these lands from Northern Dynasty.


I'm assuming they mean the land that was purchased from us. The pebble partnership has the ability to acquire lands from NAK? You seem to have a better understanding of how these deals work. I don't quite understand what kind of agreement PLP and NAK(being a part of PLP) have in regards to land ownership but I'm assuming if we enter a JV with PLP instead of just NAK it would only be a good thing given Anglo's resources and the amount of money they are pouring into the pebble project. Do you see this as a good possibility(a JV with PLP similar to FMM) or do you see the difinitive agreement coming out with NAK as originally planned?
icon url

L-Back

10/05/10 8:43 AM

#31760 RE: onemessageonly #30805

OMO are you still with us?