OK, I do ask the question to the customers too, they do not know, for example they ask for chemical resistance, I ask which chemical?, they will not name one, EPX is highly resistant to most chemicals, they ask for energy losses, I tell them, but they cannot figure it out. That'^s the reality. They mostly do not know. Also a problem is the the resistance to new ideas. Then I move onto another customer. I cannot waste time.
Heat transfer is basically through conduction from one side to another, then you have radiation and convection from that surface. Nansulate will kill the conduction so well. That is the critical point. The rest is also important, but that's a long story.
About your side note, I am very glad that you mentioned it. A company bought some stuff from me, but months later I found out that only 1/3 of what was recommended was applied to the building.
I have written a report about my office, which did not need any heating all winter, my dataloggers are still on and working. I see and feel and live it everday, sometimes with my visitors, what test could be more convincing than what I experience personally.
Depending on how many coats you apply, it will be better or worse than any other insulation, but Nansulate is flexible, could be applied anywhere, as much as you like, I read a study where they did a D..C... foam 18 cm for 82% energy savings, EPX at 2-3 mm would show much higher savings.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
