Replies to post #49602 on The Question and Answer Board (IHUB)

[chisox pat]

On the other flip side. I would say that judging by his membermarks, to say that Derf amuses only himself would be a gross misstatement. To my mind there are far more annoying people on the other side of the issue. Perhaps those who had listened to Derf rather than Mach on SSWH are glad they did.

[hasher]

Why banned??? Is the Ignore feature not all that should be necessary. Anyone who doesn't like a posters style SIMPLY has to put him on ignore...
What In the world is so complicated about that.
IT IS SO SIMPLE that perhaps the zealots over on MACH can't figure it out.

The real reason that they prefer banning to using the ignore button, with Matt's blessing, is not because they don't want to read the negative stuff, IT'S BECAUSE THEY DON"T WANT ANYONE ELSE TO READ IT, in case the reader may see something that makes sense to them. It is a shame they can control what others should and shouldn't be allowed to read. TSK,TSK

These tramplers of the first amendment are no better than cultists, fundamentalists and flag burners.
SOME please teach these people how to work the ignore button

Still no answer to my simple question to matt.. "Are they in violation of the TOU, in your opinion?" A simple yes or no will suffice.