News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jfburk

09/27/10 4:32 PM

#89158 RE: akeygon #89157

akeygon, I had the same conversation with Merle and Scott was very upset that the term expected was put into the PR for this very reason. I am confident that the term expected meant something entirely different to Scott than it did to you.

Initially I read it like others did here but then re-read it and see it from Scott's point of view. The report was expected to be received BY THE COMPANY by the end of August. Now think about it, why would the company release a report they just received to the public without having some time to review it?

All this discussion about "expected" is nothing more than a diversion from what is going on within the company and I believe it is all good.

There is no question in my mind that the report has been received by the company and I further believe it has been sent to BC for review and a lifting of the CTO, however I don't think the company at this point is all that concerned about the CTO. They are more focused on putting something much bigger together. This is a major project that if done right will make all longs extremely happy.
icon url

luckysdad

09/27/10 5:33 PM

#89163 RE: akeygon #89157

Merle is technically correct, in that the release stated the report was "expected" by end of ... And no, I do nopt think that the company should have anticipated gov't delay. I think they wanted to placate us and were a bit loose in their language in the last PR.

I was critical of that, but I am way over it. Suggest others get over it as well. Focus on spectacular property and exceptional team.