News Focus
News Focus
icon url

DewDiligence

09/13/10 3:34 PM

#104070 RE: RockRat #104068

We know that proprietary restriction enzymes are an obligate part of MNTA’s characterization technology. Is there a practical workaround to allow a competitor to produce its own restriction enzymes without infringing MNTA’s patent? I don’t know.
icon url

DewDiligence

09/13/10 3:46 PM

#104073 RE: RockRat #104068

…this patent…seems to suffer from one of the defects that Momenta claims the Copaxone patents suffer from: indefiniteness due to the failure to adequately define a key term. Namely the same term of "average molecular weight." Anyone see this differently?

In the Copaxone case, NVS/MNTA’s argument that average molecular weight is not well-defined did not make any headway with Judge Jones, who ruled that the meaning of the term is clear to those practiced in the art. So this is likely not a problem in MNTA’s own patent.