News Focus
News Focus
icon url

up and up

09/10/10 9:55 AM

#236010 RE: JMac9 #236008

well said.
icon url

jcJet12

09/10/10 12:47 PM

#236026 RE: JMac9 #236008

JMac - well put - I think there are some whos memories seem to be clouded by all the double talk and inuendo that seem to spread easily by others not well knowledged in this case. It all comes down to Sussman and the EC and why they are expending all their time and effort - they know something, that will reap and repay for all the anguish this has caused to all.
icon url

steved_45

09/10/10 1:10 PM

#236029 RE: JMac9 #236008

My point is that 30BB in assets doesn't mean 30BB in cash. Remember an asset on a banks balance sheet is a loan lent on leverage backed by customer's deposits (liabilities) and multiple types of short/long term loans.

Here is an article that breaks it down that all should read:
http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/04/bank-balance-sheet-liquidity-and.html

The more I think about it, the more I feel that the pref's and commons will be assumed by JPM or at least some some type of ratio transfer for commons. If JPM had to pay out 30BB in cash they would be seriously damaged financially and most likely just declare bankruptcy.