Replies to post #6655 on Wolverine Resources Corp (WOLV)

[Mr. Zen]

hallapino, thank you so much for that summary, we are all traders here and know value when we see it, but truthfully, I do not know squat about rock formations or what is good or what is outstanding.

If you would be so kind as to lend your expertise here for the rest of us we will all benifit. Thank you so much.here are some questions I have

1. could this actually go down up to a mile deep before they find the bottom?

2. some other copper mines are working on .10 to .25% Cu, given the existing infrastructure here, what kind of tonnage and %Cu would make for a feasibility study for a 15 to 30 year mine?

3. Is it not best to continue to drill and prove up reserves rather than joint venture the property in this early phase?

I could go on but I am sure the rest of my questions will be answered shortly. thanks again.

[mytvsbroke]

thanks for that summary hallapino. would you by chance remember any composite dollar values, whether ballpark or otherwise, of any of these camps? I knew Noranda was a household word but on the small end would it be beneficial to look at the Geco mine @ Manitouwadge (perhaps another) for a start???

[GreenTea]

Very nice post hall! Great thoughts.

GLTA!

[Mr. Zen]

interesting comment you make hallapino

Known districts are good hunting grounds for new discoveries so expect that if Wolv posts good assays that may set off a mini exploration boom in this part of Labrador.

We know there was a mini staking rush to the north west of the claims, most likely down trend from the current outcropping / drill sites.

[jayree]

hallapino, where r u? refering to this post of hallapino, we found .24% and not far from Hal's comment of .3%.... they are just poking the arms and not the main conductor which is 250m away. concentrations increase on the main body ore.

EM survey shows conductive material and the drill showed mineralization. IP next then deep drill... expecting to see the details program soon in the next PR.