"So, am I correct that the judge could still issue summary judgement (or a denial thereof) on the motion related to inequitable conduct on the part of Teva?"
Don't think so. Inequitable conduct requires a high burden of proof, and summary judgement on that basis even more so. So far as I can tell, the Momenta/Sandoz legal team did not get so ambitious as to file a motion for summary judgement on the basis of inequitable conduct -- or on obviousness, for that matter -- just for indefiniteness. This was filed on 12/23/2009. See
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
