InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

IMGGorBust

09/02/10 8:41 PM

#25458 RE: Not a Pumper #25456

Agreed but I'm not sure how that's misleading. The only negative outcome is NSE. The only other options are SE and we all retire filthy rich, or AI and we wait a little longer to retire filthy rich. As long as it's not NSE we end up rich, and NSE only happens 3% of the time. Those sound like pretty good odds to end up filthy rich to me.
icon url

mr_sano

09/03/10 11:02 AM

#25507 RE: Not a Pumper #25456


100 apply yr1
50 are SE
47 have changes
3 NSE

100 apply yr2
50 are SE
94 have changes
3 are NSE

100 apply yr3
50 are SE
141 need changes
3 are NSE

How does this become 97% approval? If the carryover from each period is not included in that calculation then the number has no statistical significance.