Replies to post #6643 on eMax Holdings, Inc. (fka EMXC)

[DrDouglas]

Many thanks to GuruTrader for securing this information.

Dr. Doug

[pire]

Not a date given! All about making noise again! Possibly, Maybe, Legal Counsel. I fully intend to call and ask to speak to or email legal counsel.
These answers have done nothing but create more doubt for the Shareholders. Cancel a Shareholders Meeting? They cannot keep the lights on to afford to put one on folks.
Really need to let someone else run this show and get dates and commit to them. Just flat out BS.
I want my dividends. You have them and that is not fair. So until these can get dispursed, I will continue to be upset.

[pumper_stumper]

Responses to Q & A (part 1)

I started working on this yesterday. There is too much here to fit in just one post. I will have to break it up!

"POSSIBLY"

I will first start off my reply with discussion of the typical EXMC/legal slant, POSSIBLY. If you look at most of these "answers" they preface ANY date with the word "possibly". How much more weak can you be with your answers EMXC?

Here is a scenario, let's say it's February 2011, and the financials are still not audited. The enraged shareholder gets on the phone and calls EMXC, "Where are the audited financials? I thought you said 4 weeks to 4 months back in September. Where are they?". Of course EMXC's response is, "Oh, we only said PROBABLY 4 months max, it's taking longer, sorry."

For all of these answers with "possible" in them, my follow up would be to ask if double the maximum would be "possible". In other words if they say it's possibly going to take 4 weeks to 4 months, I would ask, "well could it 'possibly' take 8 months?

I will bold face the word "possibly" in every EXMC response.

Question 1 what is the official number of shares in the float? 381,716,824

First, this was not my question, but now reading it I see the REAL question that should have been asked is what is the outstanding shares count in EMXC! Who cares what the float is if they issued more shares to insiders? Those wouldn't be considered float. So my full follow up question would be as of Sept 1 2010, what is EXMC's outstanding share count?

Question 2 when will we see audited financials ? Possibly 4 weeks – 4 months depending on the availability of the staff of the company auditors

Wow!! How's that for a range! In April we were told they the auditors were ALREADY reviewing the figures, and NOW 5 months later we are told 4 weeks to 4 months MORE? 9 MONTHS to do an audit? And that's only "possibly"?

Question 3 and 7 (same question)

7) Give us a deadline when the company will pay these dividends. A deadline is a date, as in November 1, NOT "soon" or "very soon". On April 1, regarding the dividends, the company said they were "preparing to mail to the shareholders in the next few weeks". It is now 4 months since then. Why hasn't there been a PR on the status of this as "few weeks" have turned into a more than a few MONTHS?

90 days- 6 months possibly depending on availability of time availability of FINRA And the SEC officers to help with the name change corporate action event and their review of these previous corporate actions.

Putting the blame on FINRA and the SEC availability? PLEASE! You put out a press release saying its going to happen in WEEKS, which was YEARS after the dividends were declared, and NOW you want to blame it on agency's schedules? So when you said the dividends were "weeks" away, you hadn't even contacted the agencies yet? Sorry, this needs a LOT more explanation.

Note part of the question was not even addressed. It was asked "Why hasn't there been a PR on the status of this as "few weeks" have turned into a more than a few MONTHS?" That was not addressed in the response.

continued....

[pumper_stumper]

Responses to Q & A (part 2)

Question 4 i would like to know any developments on the "launch of its massive product lines" as stated in last months pr.- Music, video and software Products are being produced and marketed currently to retailers and for sale to the general public and through the new store portals the company is currently building

No, the question (not mine) was asking for DEVELOPMENTS. "Being marketed" is not a development, getting a retailer to sell your product IS an example of a development.

Sorry, there was a response, but it did not even come close to answering the question.

Question 5 Any plans in share buyback, reduction of shares, or cancellation of shares? Possibly.. there is also a 1000 for one reverse that the board approved in year 2008 and is awaiting Finra announcement of the effective date for such event

Possibly? Possibly what? All 3 choices? And possibly not all 3, right? lol How's that for an answer?

And again, blaming on Finra? It is perhaps that Finra wants EXMC to for once present them all the information they were asking for, but EXMC hasn't yet provided?

I do like the reminder of the reverse split in the works. I bet many here had no idea of that!


Question 6 Why has the company not responded to other emails sent asking for the status/plans for the dividend payments? Why is this email being answered, but not others sent in the past with the same question?
The company has been in a quiet mode per the request of their counsel . While they have been making regular filings to the SEC and OTCIQ markets, the company has felt all necessary information has been placed there for the public to see all at the same time and as per the requirements of those agencies and the trading exchange.

First look at this gem, "While they have been making regular filings to the SEC and OTCIQ markets". Huh? While that have been making REGULAR filings? Show me where? And no sorry PR's are not filings. Where were the "regular filings" since the only ones I see, in April? Where? Show me them! Show me the "regular filings? for the April to June quarter!

And Jackk_Lutz, this one is for you. You have told us on several occasions that Roxanne as emailed you about "news coming up". Well then, one of you is lying. EMXC say's they are in a quiet period. You said they are responding to you about upcoming developments. WHO IS TELLING THE TRUTH Jack??

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=53482844

Who is lying there Jack? You or Roxanna? You cannot both be telling the truth!


Question 9 Where are the "several" (the company's word) SEC filings that were said to be coming following the April PR. There has not been one SEC filing since that statement, correct? Confirm this statement, or refute with a link to a filing.

The new filings are being prepared by the company and will be filed with the very near term,


Here we go again! Not even a "possibly" range? "Very near term". That means NOTHING to me. It that a week? Month? Decade?

So lets review, 5 months later, the best you can say after promising more filings under way is "very near term"?

Note of course, the following question was IGNORED

""There has not been one SEC filing since that statement, correct?""

Why can't EXMC answer that with the truth. Show us the filings or be up front and confirm we the question asks. Say it EMXC, "yes, you are correct, there have been no filings". THAT WOULD BE ANSWERING MY QUESTION.

Why avoid it?

[pumper_stumper]

Responses to Q & A (part 3)

Question 10 What has transpired in the 4 months since the results were published and presented to the auditors? Why have no updates been released on the status of the audit in 4 months? What is the expected completion date of the audit?

There was NO RESPONSE in the answers. Q10 was skipped Yes, the LAST part of it was covered in another answer, but the first 2 were not even attempted to be answered.

Question 11 This is one of my favorites! Read this one! What is the range of shares to be issued in the D 506 offering? The over one month old PR mentions a dollar amount but not the number of shares. If that cannot be answered now, what is the DATE when that information will be given to shareholders (once again, soon is not an acceptable answer)

The 506 D offering is for the benefit exclusively of the future spin out company, eMax Media Group, as stated, not eMax Worldwide. This is not a relevant question for EMXC

It isn't relevant? Then why was a PR put out under EXMC's name proudly announcing this?

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/eMax-Worldwide-Inc-Announces-iw-1839991055.html?x=0&.v=1

Look at the damn title they EMXC put on this PR!

eMax Worldwide, Inc. Announces Current Business Activities

Not relevant to Emax worldwide? Yet you put the company's name in the VERY TITLE of the PR?? Does it say Emax Media ANYWHERE in the title?? I read eMax Holdings in that PR, do you? So Emax puts out a PR and when asked about it say's its not relevant to EMXC? Hilarious!

Further in the PR it says:

This filing will enable the company soon to be a fully reporting company. Roxanna Weber, The CEO of eMax Worldwide, stated,"

Again, look what's mentioned. EMax media group? NO! It's Roxanna, "THE CEO OF EMAX WORDWIDE".

Here is another quote from the article: "" will be filing the S-1 filing for eMax Worldwide. "" Filing for EMAX Worldwide? That's what it says! The SEC filing is for Emax wordwide and someone has the audacity to say it's not a relevant question for EXMC?

So what do we chalk this one up to?


Question 12 Why doesn't the company publish quarterly revenue numbers? The company is on the pinksheets company and is not required to file quarterly filings. Once the company finishes filing their audits and last filings their corporate counsel is preparing and is then again a fully reporting company then they will be required to file quarterly reports

Sure you aren't required to, no one said you were! The question was WHY don't you report it. The question was avoided! Just because you aren't required to doesn't mean you can't report to the shareholders WHO OWN EXMC what their revenues are. EVEN more, you state you want to become a fully reporting company, yet you don't share the revenue numbers because you don't have to?

Is this a joke?

[pumper_stumper]

Responses to Q & A (part 4)

Ready folks? This is one of the best ones too!

Question 17 Are they still planning the reported Shareholders Meeting and if so, when is the date of the event?

Due to the recent circumstances surrounding Mr Webers health and passing the shareholder meeting possibly will be changed to a new venue and date

DING DING DING DING!

Do I know this company or what? lol Take a look at the last line in this post of mine:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=53407952

""Anyone want to wager that the annual stockholders meeting will not take place on the date planned? (don't worry, there will be an excuse you can all cling to when it's postponed)"" Good thing no one took me on on that wager!

How's that for a stretch, the meeting date is 3 months away, and yet they are blaming a recent death as a reason for postponing the meeting! Classic EMXC!! Ever you ever been to an annual meeting? They take an hour or two MAX! Yep, no way they can be ready to prepare for that in 3 months! ;-)

NOTE Earlier, in the answer to Question 8 (go back and look) the death is said to be behind us, which they tell us means they can now proceed with the audit, yet an annual meeting 3 months away has to be postponed due to the death! THINK ABOUT THAT ONE!


Question 20 What is EMAX actually selling into the market and how can we help?

All product will be soon seen at the eMax sites and internet stores and in the future in retail stores and all promotion of such items would be a great help to the company.


Is language an issue here? I see someone (not me) asking what EMXC is selling. I see that answer given as, "All product". Does that answer that question? When will the products be available?? What is the answer? "soon"

Folks these, "soons", "very soons" and "possibly's" are weak vague answers, the kind of answers an 8 year old would give to avoid answering their parents. But of course, the parents wouldn't accept that answer. It's not good enough to say to a parent, I am going to clean my room "soon". Yet here, in the supposedly profession corporation, it is the practically the company motto!

The answers here are all worded to avoid any accountability, just like almost most of the PR this company has even released. You can never be wrong if you say "soon" or "possibly"!

"SOON" could be a decade!! There is no timed definition of "soon". Soon to you does not have to mean soon from the company's point of view!

THIS Q AND A HAS EVEN MORE CONVINCED ME OF EVERY NEGATIVE THOUGHT I HAVE EVER HAD ABOUT THIS COMPANY! My opinion is EMXC is lower!

They have hired gurutrader to support them (yes he works for Levelstock.com, see his profile) and yet, no one can spin avoidance and vague answers into anything substantial. That's just been proven here!

[jackk_lutz]

I believe that post answers all of the questions very nicely..

[pumper_stumper]

Emax float up 39%!!!!

From the Emax Q and A posted by Guru on Sept 1 - "1) what is the official number of shares in the float? 381,716,824 "


According to pink sheets

"Float 530,035,649 a/o Nov 01, 2010""

This means in just 2 months the Emax float rose by 39 PERCENT!

Notice that NO ONE has mentioned this? Do you wonder why? You won't (pink sheet investors don't) but you should.

Paid PR is NOT cheap, it comes at a price of dilution folks! Paid PR is NOT business. REVENUES are business. Note how the PR's and interviews NEVER mention a single word about REVENUES, how much, their change, and where they come from. Wonder why? (most pink sheet investors don't care about revenues)

Next time instead of jumping for joy seeing all the paid posters posting here, the paid PR people posting interviews (that say nothing of substance) seemingly every other week and other PRs posted... THINK... THINK about what it's costing you, instead of being naive and reciting the paid PR like its a mantra.

2814 Days since 2003 Dividends were declared and not paid! Don't worry, they are coming "soon".

Correction, EMXC has gotten tired of being ridiculed over the use of "soon". The latest PR says "very near term"

So, don't worry, dividends are coming in the very near term