News Focus
News Focus
icon url

ABIGIDIOT

08/28/10 1:19 PM

#233401 RE: tombrady12nh #233397

delay, naturally.
icon url

FORTY-8

08/28/10 1:23 PM

#233402 RE: tombrady12nh #233397

To tombrady: You don't say or do such things to an officer of the court who is armed with federal subpoena power.
icon url

WithCatz

08/28/10 1:46 PM

#233409 RE: tombrady12nh #233397

tombrady12nh, have your read what THJMW said about the examiner?

so what happens if the Examiner tells THJMW "they were not cooperative, and would not give us any documents"



THJMW on 7/20: " I would like a preliminary report by the examiner by the September 7th omnibus hearing regarding this... what it has done to date... he or she has done to date, and what more needs to be done to complete the legal analysis and review of the documents that have been produced. If I am convinced that no additional discovery is needed I would order a report by October 8th.

If I believe that additional discovery or review of documents and legal analysis is warranted that deadline may push out"


Remember, the Examiner is an extension of THJMW. If he wants documents, she wants documents, and vice versa.

No documents, I read, as an extension of the Examiner until he gets what he wants, or she wants.


...Catz
icon url

Lawrence 147

08/28/10 1:52 PM

#233410 RE: tombrady12nh #233397

Tombrady12nh;


Are you suggesting that the FDIC or JPM Chase would disregard a subpoena? That would not be a good thing. If one attempts to force a court to collect information through other means; if you get the chance one day I would really put forth the recommendation to hand over all of everything you have.
This isn’t the country our grandparents helped build any more; laws and powers have shifted a considerable amount. Just think now in places you can be arrested and your children taken away if you smoke in the car in their presence. One place I know of it holds even for your home.
The country has become about power and the court can and will get WMI information if it wants it; they have given every opportunity to do this the nice way. It is setup and clear cut now that should the subpoena be ignored the court would have every right and reason to use whatever force is necessary to recover any and all WMI documents from any non performing party.
Though I would love to see the U.S. Marshal’s Office bust down the doors to a couple of these fine institutions that would be unlikely; but they could just walk through the door and shut everything down having everyone sit there with their hands on top of their desks until they are searched and sent home until the task at hand is completed.
In the event the court decides that the use of the U.S. Marshal’s office is not appropriate it could just close the door on further introduction of evidence from parties that certify they have no further evidence and decide the case from the outside parties’ information.
In any event information will be available to make a decision by the court and render a decision.
It will primarily be based on the law and mechanical in nature.