So PPHM has facilities to manufacture biopharmaceuticals—how is that enough to make them a serious player in FoB’s?
I think the answer is that PPHM is defining an FoB as almost any biopharmaceutical—whether or not the development program is based on characterizing and reverse-engineering another company’s product. By this definition, PPHM’s claims with respect to FoB’s are essentially meaningless, IMO.
'and was responsible for DNA’s obtaining marketing approval for 17 drug products including Rituxan, Herceptin, Avastin, and Lucentis, and 3 mfg. facilities… '
although a nice man, Mr garnick had very little to do with any of these approvals. he never stepped foot in front of the FDA on at least 4/4 f those drug approvals