Again, you pretend to be incapable of understanding basic reasoning. Bravo. So I bite.
The examples corroborate a principle; they don't serve as correlates. Veve is no genius, but his spelling acuity is in no way related to the legitimacy of the stock.
Your spelling and syntax and grammar are sub-par, but I take you seriously. Based on your logic, should I dismiss your ideas as without merit?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
