News Focus
News Focus
icon url

AnderL

02/04/05 6:07 PM

#3115 RE: AnderL #3114

'US servicemen to land in Korea in case of war'
'US servicemen to land in Korea in case of war'
(AFP)

4 February 2005



SEOUL - The United States will deploy some 690,000 military personnel to help defend South Korea in case of an outbreak of war, South Korea’s Defense Ministry said in a White Paper released on Friday.


The new White Paper, the first in four years, tried to sidestep a political minefield by avoiding naming the enemy US forces might have to fight against.

North Korea is no longer South Korea’s “main enemy,” a phrase that angered the Stalinist state when it was included in the last White Paper in 2000 and has been left out of this one.

Now, North Korea is simply referred to as a “military threat,” in the new policy document that reflects the South Korean government’s goal of reconciliation with Pyongyang.

The 2004 Defence White Paper said more than 690,000 servicemen in augmentation forces would be brought in to the Korean peninsula in case of an all-out war, including the army, navy, air force, and marine corps units.

The augmentation forces would be dispatched to join more than 30,000 US troops already based here and some 650,000 South Korea forces.

North Korea army was 1.17 million strong in 2004, the world’s fifth largest and the same as four years earlier, but the communist country has added artillery guns and multiple rocket launchers totaling 1,000 pieces since then, the White Paper said.

US forces deployed to the Korean peninsula would be made up of army divisions, carrier battle groups with advanced fighter planes, tactical fighter wings, and marine expeditionary forces based on the Japanese island of Okinawa and on the US mainland, the policy document said.

“The United States has a plan to send more than 40 percent of its entire navy, more than half of its airforce and more than 70 percent of its marine corps to defend South Korea,” it said.

“This shows the United States is firmly determined in its will to help defend the Korean Korean peninsula,” the White Paper said.

The augmentation forces of more than 690,000 US military personnel would be backed by 160 vessels and 1,600 aircraft, according to the White Paper.

It also said North Korea had set up a missile bureau under the command of the Ministry of Korean People’s Army.

Since the early 1980s, North Korea has been developing ballistic missiles. It has already produced and deployed 500-kilometer-range (312-mile) Scud-Cs by upgrading the old Soviet-made Scud-Bs.

It also deployed 1,300-kilometer Rodong-1 missiles.

Since the late 1990s, North Korea has been feverishly developing Daepodong-1 with a range of up to 2,500 kilometers and Daepodong-2 with a range of up to 6,700 kilometers.

There is no firm evidence that North Korea possesses nuclear weapons, the White Paper said.

However, there is a possibility that the North might have extracted 10-14 kilogrammes (22-31 pounds) of weapons-degree plutonium it had obtained from spent fuel before the 1992 inspection of its nuclear facilities by the UN nuclear watchdog, it said.

North Korea has been in a stand-off with the United States and US allies over its nuclear weapons programme.

The row erupted in October, 2002 after US officials accused Pyongyang of operating a secret uranium-enriching programme to produce weapons in breach of a 1994 agreement, a charge North Korea denies.

The 2004 White Paper was the first since the ministry suspended publication of the periodical following the dispute over the paper’s reference to North Korea as its “main enemy.”

Citing the continuing use of the “main enemy” label Pyongyang accused Seoul of a breach of an inter-Korean declaration for peace and reconciliation signed at a historic 2000 summit meeting.
icon url

FinancialAdvisor

02/05/05 1:40 AM

#3126 RE: AnderL #3114

Analysts worry over arms sale to PRC

Analysts worry over arms sale to PRC
2005-02-04 / Taiwan News, Staff Reporter / By Taijing Wu

The European Union's plan to lift a weapons-sale embargo on China would harm both the interests of the United States as well as the military status quo in the Asia Pacific region, Taiwanese parliamentarians and scholars said yesterday.

The European Union has long considered lifting the weapons-sale embargo over China. The initiative, however, has consistently drawn criticism from other parties, such as the U.S., Taiwan and Japan. The European Union decided to impose the embargo on China back in 1989 due to the Tiananmen Square incident, which took place on June 4 of that year.

The U.S. congress passed a Februaury resolution of 411 votes to three opposing the European Union plan to speed up the lifting of the embargo. The resolution said that such an act would endanger Taiwan and the U.S. troops' security in Asia.

A republican congressman elected in California said, during a debate on the resolution, that the move by the European Union would threaten Taiwan, which he said was one of Asia's most democratized countries and also a close partner of the U.S..

Another democrat congressman said that Europe has dissolved its ethical guidelines and is about to endanger U.S. military troops.

Professor Wu Chih-chung (吳?quot;中) Ph.D. of the Soochow University's Political Science Department told Taiwan News that in carrying out the plan, the European Union is seeking a new world order by allying and strengthening China.

"The countries that will be influenced first are the U.S., Japan and Taiwan. If China gains the high-tech military capacity of Europe, the military status quo in the Asia Pacific region will become extremely unbalanced.

However, as Taiwan doesn't have the ability to negotiate the issue with the European Union, it creates an opportunity for Taiwan to request further military assistance from the U.S," said Professor Wu Chih-chung.

"Europe is seeking a partner to counter the super-power status of the United States. However, it does not understand the threat that China represents to the island because the problems with which Taiwan must deal seem unimportant to the Europeans in comparison to the situation in Iraq or the long-term Israeli-Palestinian conflict," added Wu.

"Taiwan has become a victim of its own success," said the professor, "Europe sees that Taiwan still has some degree of exchange with China as there are charter flights, discussions on the 'three links' etc... and Europe seems to have the impression that China is the one that needs help rather than Taiwan. In fact, the behavior of the Taiwanese government is entirely defined by its enemy on the other side of the Taiwan Strait. No matter what Taiwan tries to do in terms of internal or foreign policy, Beijing perceives it as an attempt to move towards independence."

Washington also alleges that an end to the EU embargo could destabilize the Taiwan Strait and put the U.S. Seventh Fleet at risk.

Media reports said the EU regards the lifting of the embargo, which has limited practical effect, to be a symbolic move, in-keeping with the growing partnership between Europe and China.


LINK: http://www.etaiwannews.com/Taiwan/Politics/2005/02/04/1107482148.htm