wau77, There is no mandated requirement that folks carry...
... around a MedFlash, or any other similar device. And not likely to ever be such a requirement. An embedded RFID chip would simply give the market another option to consider. The difference being you can't lose the data.
Religious arguments are for those who allow religion to rule their lives. Same for societal arguments. Ultimately, if they don't like the option they won't buy into it. in the end, only the "market" will decide the winner.
Certainly, an embedded RFID chip is not for everyone. But I admit that I have a pro-technology bias. I grew up in the computer business, starting out at age 20 back in 1963 as a programmer. I retired in 2002 at age 56. Because of my back ground I don't see any problem whatsoever with RFID. And it does easily solve a certain class of problems. But even today I have several good friends who remain computer averse and won't even use email, etc. So Different strokes for different folks, as they say.
RFID really is a much better solution than what is being proposed. But as I said, THAT is my bias and my opinion as a retired technologist. But I strongly believe that it will be several years before the dust settles and we know what works and who has it.
As it stands right now Connectyx is just one more "me too" player with a lookalike product. In situations like this they can only compete on price. I was simply suggesting that they should break away from the crowd and be innovative, while there is still time to do so. That is, if they want to ultimately win the game.
All just my opinion...
VV
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
