InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Leafs007

08/10/10 12:22 PM

#621 RE: risi #620

Well, we don't know if he is shorting it or not....his article, to me, seems credible which doesn't boast well for ONP and, for that matter, Chinese sc....
icon url

risi

08/10/10 2:53 PM

#623 RE: risi #620

OK, after sifting through this "anonymous" blogger's article, this guy is full of crap. I'm back in with a full position.
icon url

Michael Anderson

08/10/10 3:03 PM

#624 RE: risi #620

I do not blame you for selling out because of the selling pressure. When I saw the blog last night, I was thinking of selling in after hours yesterday or pre market today anticipating it would appear as news, which it did. I had a feeling it would effect the stock. I did not sell because these short term distractions are just unknown bloggers manipulating and providing misleading info. There is so much to go through especially on CCAs other articles that are easily disputed, but in this new one. He first provides information that is directed from his own site and not from an actual link. He fabricates information in everything he states. In regards to him stating that they are a shell, that is incorrect. It is a supplier and as stated on many occasions SAIC documents are not neccessarily an indication of actual revenue. This is his probably his best manipulation because it is probably the most difficult to disprove, but there is much more to what he states in just about everything he posts. Knowing that the results would be coming soon, his only purpose is to drop the price of the stock, otherwise if CCA was so certain of fraud, he would wait for the results. Then he tries to discredit Loeb and Loeb, and Deloitte so when the results come, they do not mean as much. It is a joke.