PD unfortunately what you are suggesting with rotary ICE (internal combustion engines) takes time and R&D funds. Yes Hydrogen generators have been around for nearly a century, but hydrogen really created a horrible name for itself after the Hindenburg disaster. After that it left the mainstream, and automotive engineers have preached against it's use ever since. It takes time to get people to change their mind about something if it has been drilled into you for a century.
HLNT has found a way to incorporate a hydrogen generator and allow it to communicate with a cars ECM which is far and away better than what any garage tinkerer has accomplished yet. HLNT is not trying to replace gasoline yet, but to prove to the market that just a small amount of hydrogen can greatly improve the efficiency of burning gas. The better gasoline is burned in the combustion process the less fuel is needed. Also that means less fuel needs to be burned secondarily by a catalytic converter.
Yes all you automotive engineers out there! Engines don't burn all the fuel! Otherwise why would we need catalytic converters to burn fuel a second time at the exhaust side of an engine. So tired of the naysayers that come here saying cars run as clean as they will get currently. They are the dilusional ones. I know that is not you PD but I'm just saying. HLNT needs to prove the technology to the market as it is, then down the road when they have grown and can absorb those R&D costs without screwing share holders should be our goal.
Ryan
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
