I for one was being facetious (note that I asked DewDiligence about his thoughts on my assertion that markets were efficient -- have you seen his message footer?)
First you claim the markets are inefficient. Then you want people to "determine a proper valuation for MNTA". Why diddle around with "proper valuation" if an inefficient market is going to ignore it anyway? I can't make money on the "proper valuation" of a stock; I can only make it on the market valuation.
For myself, I only care about a "proper valuation" (my perception or anyone else's) if it diverges very widely from the market valuation and appears susceptible to correction by a market that has some degree of efficiency.
Observation is far from a perfect guide, but it is miles away from "intuition".
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
