Replies to post #26995 on BioCurex, Inc.(fka BOCX)

[Gold Seeker]

Half, you continue to tout the Abbott license agreement.

Explain why it was necessary in the revised license agreement to specifically EXEMPT a past due royalty payment from Abbott.

Explain why Abbott has not done anything with RECAF in the past 2 1/2 years.

About Inverness?
Moro specifically stated that Abbott presenting at the ISOBM was the catalyst for signing Inverness. Now, is it that difficult for you to realize that Inverness thought Abbott was proceeding with the commercialization of RECAF?

It will soon be 3 years since Inverness licensed RECAF and their is not one single item in any of their filings, pipeline, etc., relating to RECAF. IMO, Inverness made a similar bad investment decision just as I did when Abbott presented at the ISOBM.

[Gold Seeker]

Now Half, lets discuss the "Doctor" issue with universal markers.

Why don't doctors use the current universal markers? It is no doubt true that some don't even know about them but WHY don't they know about them? Answer: There is no support for them. No labs are marketing them. Even when a lab attempts to market them, there is no interest.

Look at Dog RECAF and open your eyes half. It is not that VETS don't know about it. The news items are in their publications. Why aren't they using the test Half?