Actually, SH, I don't object to the content...
of the posts, just the way they're presented in a haphazard manner on the Thread, with titles in Capitals and hardly any supporting Links... This is too reminiscent of what we often see on RB and SI and the relevance to SEVU isn't immediately clear... All FNG has to do, as suggested, is structure a post explaining what he's driving at and how he supports his contentions with the help of Links to the material deleted...
Of course, there should be CURRENT RELEVANCE to SEVU, or at least a conclusion that concerns/affects SEVU at the end of the post or it's a waste of time...
Is FNG trying to say that the CEO of the Company that owns the Springs was in trouble with the Law back in 1996, resigned his position and, as a result, SEVU has become tainted because it bought a 20% interest in one of the Springs owned by the Company in question??... If that's the case, it's not worth a dozen posts and one or two with links would be sufficient, even though I don't see a great deal of relevance to SEVU, as it stands in 2001....
JMHO, F. Goelo + + +
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
