News Focus
News Focus
icon url

HoosierHoagie

07/23/10 7:46 PM

#329257 RE: Tuff-Stuff #329256

Stress Tests Show Banks' Strength, Weren't Too Soft, EU Policy Makers Say

By Christian Vits and Simon Kennedy - Jul 23, 2010


European policy makers said the results of bank stress tests highlight the strength of their financial systems and rejected criticism the probes were too soft as 92 percent of the lenders passed.

“The French banking system once again shows its capacity to resist crises,” Bank of France Governor Christian Noyer said yesterday after the four largest French banks were ruled to have enough capital to outlast an economic slump and sovereign debt crisis. In Germany, where Hypo Real Estate Holding AG was the only one of 14 banks to fail the test, the Bundesbank and financial regulator BaFin said the “banking system has shown itself to be robust and proved its resilience.”

Finance chiefs carried out health checks of 91 banks in a bid to reassure investors about the state of financial institutions after the public-debt crisis pummeled the bonds of Greece, Spain and Portugal. The seven banks said to have insufficient reserves faced a combined capital shortfall of 3.4 billion euros ($4.4 billion), raising concern the evaluations weren’t strict enough.

The European Central Bank said banks that failed need to raise fresh capital or resort to government aid. It said the study “represents an important step forward in supporting the stability of the EU and euro-area banking sectors” and called the criteria “substantially adverse in macroeconomic and financial terms.”

The “exercise is an important contribution to bolstering confidence in the European banking system and strengthening the resilience and robustness of the global financial system,” Financial Stability Board Chairman Mario Draghi said in a statement. “The results provide additional clarity and transparency on the strength of the European banking sector.”

Capital Plan

In Greece, where the public-debt turmoil started at the end of last year, Finance Minister George Papaconstantinou said Agricultural Bank of Greece SA, the state-controlled lender that failed the test, will be required to present a plan to bolster capital by the end of the year and that the government would help if investors wouldn’t. The bank said it will proceed with a share-capital increase.

“The results are positive and show that the Greek banking system can cope even in conditions far worse than the present,” he said.

Spanish Finance Minister Elena Salgado said there is no “urgency” for the five Spanish lenders that fell short in the tests to raise new capital. Italy renewed an offer to buy bonds from lenders that need to raise capital after Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA passed a stress test with a capital buffer of less than 235 million euros.

Traded Bonds

The evaluations took into account potential losses only on government bonds the banks trade, rather than those they are holding to maturity, according to the Committee of European Banking Supervisors, which coordinated the initiative. That means the tests ignored the majority of banks’ holdings of sovereign debt, investors said. They also didn’t allow for a country defaulting.

Bank of Italy Deputy General Director Anna Maria Tarantola said she was confident the results would “put an end to the rumors and uncertainty that has formed in the market, and create a climate of confidence.” ECB Vice President Vitor Constancio called the tests “severe” and explained they didn’t include a scenario of a national default because “we don’t believe there will be a default.”

Former Bank of England policy maker David Blanchflower said the criteria suggest a “relatively loose stress test.”

“It strikes me that the scenarios being tested aren’t particularly tough,” Blanchflower said. “What if it’s much worse than that? There are too many questions and it doesn’t look that convincing.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Christian Vits in Frankfurt at cvits@bloomberg.net
icon url

Tuff-Stuff

07/23/10 7:51 PM

#329258 RE: Tuff-Stuff #329256

Options Trade of the Day: Post-Earnings Synthetic Short on Yahoo! Inc.
Options trader bets on a sharp decline for this Internet portal concern
by Joseph Hargett (jhargett@sir-inc.com) 7/23/2010 4:20 PM

On July 21, Yahoo! Inc. (YHOO) released its second-quarter earnings figures to a chorus of boos from investors. The stock plunged more than 8% following the report, with losses extending through today's annual low of $13.52 per share. YHOO finds itself on the wrong side of long-term support in the 14-14.50 region, an area the shares have not closed a week below since April 2009.



As you would expect, options activity is starting to pick up on YHOO, especially on the put front. Nearly 14,000 of these bearishly oriented contracts have changed hands on YHOO today. In particular, options traders are focused on the August 14 strike, where more than 8,000 puts have changed hands so far.

While the August 14 strike has been the most actively traded, there was a much more interesting trade at the August 15 strike. Specifically, a block of 400 contracts traded at the ask price of $1.27 on the International Securities Exchange (ISE) at about 11:35 a.m. Eastern time. This block was marked "spread." The other half of this trade crossed on the August 15 call, where a block of 400 contracts traded at the same time on the same exchange for the bid price of $0.12. Given this data, it would appear that we are looking at a synthetic short position on Yahoo!.



The Anatomy of a Yahoo! Inc. Synthetic Short

Before we get into the particulars, a synthetic short options trade attempts to replicate as closely as possible a short stock position. The trader buys at-the-money puts and sells at-the-money calls in equal numbers at the same strike with the same expiration date. By using options, the trader gains considerable leverage, allowing for greater returns on the position than those that would be achieved by investing the same amount of money in a short stock position.

This particular synthetic short on YHOO breaks down as follows: The trader bought 400 YHOO August 15 puts for the ask price of $1.27. The total debit incurred for entering this position would be $50,800 -- (1.27 * 100) * 400 = $50,800. At the same time, the trader sold 400 August 15 calls for the bid price of $0.12. The total credit for entering this leg of the position arrives at $4,800 -- (0.12 * 100) * 400 = $4,800. Combining this leg of the trade with the purchased August 15 put results in a net debit of $46,000-- $50,800 - $4,800 = -$46,000 -- plus brokerage fees and margin requirements.



The maximum profit on this trade is equal to the purchased put strike minus the debit paid upon entering the position. Since the initiation of the trade resulted in a debit of $1.15, the maximum profit is $13.85, or $1,385 per contract -- $15 - 1.15 = $39.64. Since there is no cap to how high YHOO shares can rally, the potential losses are theoretically unlimited. Breakeven, meanwhile, is calculated by subtracting the net debit from the strike price of the purchased August 15 put, and arrives at $13.85. Below is a chart for a rough visual representation of the trade's profit/loss scenario:



Implied Volatility

Rising implied volatility is pretty neutral for a synthetic short trade. It lifts the value of both the purchased and the sold options, thus increasing the cost to buy back the sold call and boosting the premium received when selling the purchased put. At the time of the trade, implied volatility for the YHOO August 15 call rested at 30.38%, while implieds for the August 15 put were 31.72%. The stock's one-month historical volatility rested at 43.31% as of the close on Thursday.

Final Thoughts

On a final note, let's run a quick comparison to see the difference between a synthetic short option position and a short stock trade. For this example, assume that Trader Bob sold 100 shares of YHOO short for $15 each, the credit being $1,500 (excluding margin requirements and broker fees). Meanwhile, Trader Joe sold one August 15 call and bought one August 15 put, resulting in a debit of $1.15, or $115 per contract (again, excluding margin requirements and broker fees). Both traders control 100 shares of YHOO, but Trader Bob pocketed $1,500 while Trader Joe had to pay $115.

Let's say that YHOO closes at $13 per share on August expiration. If Trader Bob closes out his entire position, he would earn $2 per share, resulting in a profit of $200. For Trader Joe, the August 15 call would expire worthless, while the August 15 put would be worth $2. As a result, Trader Joe would earn $2 minus his initial debit of $1.15, bringing his profit on the entire position to $0.85, or $85 per contract. Now, imagine if Trader Joe had risked the same amount of capital as Trader Bob, and you can see why synthetic short option trades can be quite lucrative for bearish traders.