The White elephant in the room though Gold is the fact that you know that current tests on the market have way more false positives than Recaf. You personally had two DRE tests per year??? What a mistake Gold?...
You admit that current screening techniques SUCK! and yet you will not accept a better test (RECAF) because you say that Recaf has false positives.
NO kidding? Thank you for the unimportant bit of nonsense...
Recaf alone has 50 false positives per thousand tests per your words. That is 5% and yet some of the current SCREENING tests have 50% false positives.
You will and have paid for a Terrible test (The DRE) and relied upon the information from that terrible screening test.... You then reference a test like Biocurex's Recaf and put the test down. Un freaking believable!!!
Further Dr. Moro can couple Recaf with other markers and get the test to produce 0 ZERO false positives and yet you don't like that.
Gold your loop of information never leads to an end. You would be a great addition to Washington. Lots of discussion and no action.
Please pick a current approved screening test on the market that is better than RECAF...and post the results on this board.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
