On the right hand side of the document we see this: "The Declaration of Paul Bessette submitted in support of Greenber Traurig's motion to withdraw as counsel for Defendant Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. contains confidential and privileged information."
I guess that they have to provide the specific information to the court before it can make a determination as to whether it should be kept under seal.
Duh?
("This document that purports to be a motion to seal a document is no more than the cover form for a sealing envelope")
Pacer update 16 Jul 10 SEC v Spongetech CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:10-cv-02031-DLI -JMA
Date Filed # Docket Text
07/16/2010 91 REPLY to Response to Motion re 44 First MOTION to Appoint Receiver over Defendant Spongetech filed by U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex A Spongetech Bankruptcy Petition, # 2 Exhibit Order Vacating Dicon Stay, # 3 Exhibit Motion of U.S. Trustee to Appoint bankruptcy trustee, # 4 Exhibit Neiger Letter to Bankruptcy Court, # 5 Exhibit Spongetech Motion to Retain New bankruptcy Counsel, # 6 Exhibit Spongetech Letter Consenting to Ch. 11 Trustee) (Tao, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/16/2010)
07/15/2010 90 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Asset Freeze and Other Relief filed by Joel Pensley. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Roger L. Fidler, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit A to Fidler Declaration, # 3 Declaration Joel Pensley, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit A to Pensley Declaration, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit B to Pensley Declaration, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit C to Pensley Declaration, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit D to Pensley Declaration) (Fidler, Roger) (Entered: 07/15/2010)
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
