A good dialogue moves toward understanding, the intersectionality, of doubters and believers. In that, we have a fully informed shareholder body.
I'm not uncomfortable with questions ferreting out the weaknesses of a company, just a waist of everyone's time when it is done merely for sport or is ego driven. If the undertone of a question or comment is to deride the company for the ego/sport of it then that's an abuse of the republics' gift of free speech.
And then to your statement, I'm a multitasker; defending JB while holding his feet to the fire is doable. Otherwise as I said above, its like kicking a wounded animal when its down.