News Focus
News Focus
icon url

edgereport

07/02/10 10:54 AM

#62225 RE: rjhstock #62224

Maybe so he could sell? That's his right. He didn't bash the stock, all he did was point out facts that many of you were trying to get from him. Don't beat up on a guy who people were clamoring for information and he obliged.
icon url

g2nec

07/02/10 10:59 AM

#62227 RE: rjhstock #62224

Thx, thought so
icon url

BBalls-N-CowTown

07/02/10 12:05 PM

#62242 RE: rjhstock #62224

Wasn't aware, but suspected as much. He could not still be on the EC and talking like that. Still appreciate the man, his efforts, can't speak to capabilities or reasons why...that is really his private business. We all have our own challenges, pressure points and capacities that never should be subject to judgement by others because they were not in the arena.

here's a tribute from long ago written by a worthy man.

http://www.theodore-roosevelt.com/trsorbonnespeech.html

Like I said before, I'm in until the fat lady sings. Goffman hasn't yet had his chance to illuminate the valuation issues, and I note that the disclosure document, though voluminous isn't really very clear, such as the Diacetal claims (tort liability), insurance, or where the other unaudited numbers actually came from that were used in the POR valuation.
icon url

double_d

07/02/10 12:13 PM

#62244 RE: rjhstock #62224

Thanks... eom
icon url

fuller11

07/02/10 7:11 PM

#62276 RE: rjhstock #62224

Is another retail investor now allowed to take his place and fight for us?