We know EEGC is 'cash poor,' with a huge cost of capital. How cash poor we will know better in early August when we see how Mr. Bendall 'pays' for his shares.
EEGC is required to drill, AND COMPLETE, Bellevue in less than eleven months from now per the lease as previously quoted in this forum
As I suggested three months ago, having someone else do the drilling is faster operationally (as you have stated with more eloquence and oil exploration experience than I), and more prudent with limited cash (I do have the start-up company experience to discuss cash management ).
Note:
- If EEGC finds oil, it will be able to get significantly less expensive financing to buy a rig and accessories, and hire a crew, than it can now. And EEGC shareholders on this board are confident that the initial wells will result in commercial discovery.
- If it doesn't find oil with the initial couple of wells, doesn't matter.
So, other than 'because management has so decided,' I am not really clear as to why rig ownership is deemed a good idea at this stage of EEGC's existence. What has changed since the company wanted to rent the Hunt rig two years ago -- other than the time of lease ending is sooner, cash is less available (again, pending how the RO comes out; note SmartWin had an option on half the company at $.25 or more per share, as I recall), and the amount of territory available to drill is less. These factors seem to tilt more toward contracting the drilling rather than owning.
Without assessing blame, just trying to find a rationale -- after the SmartWin and Hunt experiences, perhaps it is difficult for EEGC to get a contract with a driller, maybe that is why they are looking to buy a rig and staff it?
But, they then have to ship, outfit, certify and man it while working against the clock with limited dollars.
So far, EEGC is publicly committed to a purchase -- it has announced the rig and provider, and had its CEO pictured next to it. While the company does not owe the shareholders an explanation as a result of discussion in this forum, I suspect the question would arise at a shareholders meeting.