As for the long-term, I believe we have to go through the short-term to get there, including those little financial statements. Most of what I call into question regards ‘factual statements’ before opinions flow from me. If the CEO does not deliver on most of what he states in PRs, financials, etc., then no long-term will exist and he or she should be removed.
As for BIEL, their PPS is higher - and thanks for reminding me. “Andy” has trouble with paying attention to detail over at BIEL, but read the announcement on that stock today and review several of the ‘posters’ comments over the last six weeks or so and it appears “Andy” listened – not to emotional comments – but those that contained a factual foundation. The idea is to minimize the emotion as much as possible and share concrete ideas. Positive emotion without facts is always welcomed and I understand the emotional distress of others – and have no problem with that either. I do have problems with any poster that attacks another poster with nothing more than emotion. I am also not accusing you of anything either – at least yet. I read what you people have to say and look for the substance that may be helpful for all of us.
This stock’s timeframe began to tic-tock last November (JMO) and this CEO has much to explain. I have no intention of restating either the obvious or my prior post, as they are readily available.
As for ‘daily updates’, it is a fact that MCLN’s management chose that direction with the ‘cheese stories’, ‘Field of Dreams’, Q&A (which I like), etc. – not me – so your comment is misplaced factually. Therefore, MCLN set the ‘tone’ of the daily update trail and more importantly – the “substance”. Incidentally, I have not exposed MCLN for telling me that one of my e-mails would be the fruit of a Q&A last week. Maybe that fact falls into the description of what you outlined as “never delivering”. For me – the verdict is still out and I will give them benefit of the doubt.
I have no trouble with what you post – so no comment from me there. If (and as I believe) CEO Laky reads IHUB, then it’s one of my ways of communicating to him – factually and without too much emotion.
I am long on MCLN, but if MCLN sends out messages or smoke signals, then I will read and respond with opinions based on factual substance. If the tone lends itself to analogies based on a ‘Field full of Red Bagged Cheese’, then I will include a little of my own, since it appears that MCLN desires the retorts in that manner.
Again, I have no desire to invite you elsewhere – as you have done with me, but if I offend thee – hit the ignore button.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
