Replies to post #323411 on Spongetech Delivery Systems Inc (fka SPNGQ)

[puppydotcom]

hoggey1, that conversation is totally moot now - it will have no inpact on the courts

zero

did you see the bankruptcy filing on spngs only real assets?

[Risicare]

hoggey, thanks for the post underscoring your thoughts on how greatly profitable SPNG and Dicon are.

Have you had a chance to read the court documents in the Dicon Involuntary Bankruptcy Petition that say OTHERWISE?

[Zorax]

~!~ Who’s freddy. I don’t know a freddy. Kitt’s my real name.. what’s your’s?

Anyways, as far as your DD and facts go, which dicon are you referring to.



This one, http://dicontechnologies.com/
which makes no mention of spongetech, but I could have sworn, last summer actually had spongetechs name in the company history page…wish I saved that. Maybe the intenet wayback site might show it…



Or is it the china version of dicon? Or the dicon technologies inc in texas…?

And did your DD reveal patent rights sold by dicon in 2005

http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-5164640/Nesco-gains-Dicon-rights-US.html ... which confuses spongetech stories of patents as well…



Let's be very clear here Fred, the Alvarez & Marsal report does NOT rely on "facts and figures" provided by Moskowitz & Metter.



~!~ Okayyy. Where did they get the invoices from…? K’marts? The records are from spongetech and the officers. Can anything be trusted from the source? BTW, where are the records from the 99% overseas customers? Where’s cvs, kmarts, cosco? All were mentioned as customers here. Your DD doesn’t list them.



“In fact, A&M very carefully selected only the sales transactions that had all the independent documentation for verification.”



~!~ Interesting assumption, perhaps you’re inside looking out, why trying so hard to convince about A&M tenacity.



"Dicon To Build Facility in North Bryan County"



~!~ Odd, their up to date website has no pertinent new information about their new building AND the site hasn’t been updated. Why didn’t your deep 2008 DD show this.



Now is that a "defensive posture" on my part, or just a well thought out and thoroughly substantiated reply I've made in order to refute your false and misleading claims about my post and the A&M report? BTW, that's a rhetorical question.



~!~ Not quite. Claiming a rhetorical question in a negative reply would be considered a challenge or combative, thus instigating a reply. Calling me freddy sounds like a Ihub tou attack to me as well. And lastly it wasn’t very informative since most data was pre spongetech. The internet hasn’t been a bit useful in gaining new information on dicon and their factory in the new industrial park.