Actually it is more like they knew the issue, they ordered the needed replacement to fix the issue. It takes some time to manufacturer the tubing and until it is delivered why not try something until then as it is merely the test PBR in the first place. We know they did not have the new tubing on hand, nowhere does it state "we replaced tubes with new tubing and have inncolulated", we all knew they were using the same tubing. So once again where is the shock? Where is the hidden agenda?
It is called development. When developing a new product it often takes time and multiple attempts to get the product working well. It appears as though you are unwilling to give them a chance to continue working to make it right.
I'd hate to see your comments about Edison while he was developing the light bulb. He spent a lot of time and money in testing hundreds of materials for the filament of an electric lamp. Finally, the right material was found. His light bulb has been little changed in the 130 years since those experiments in the 1870s.
But I suspect you might have been in the lead telling everyone in sight that Edison was a liar and a crook because he didn't get it right the first time.
Oh man. GFB, the team at BEHL was just as surprised when the basin started filling with water as each of us were. Do you think the camera would be rolling if they were certain that the seams would give again?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
