Gileon7, or anyone, here are ?s
We know this judge, aren't they all, is a control freak. Isn't he pushing the BOD/Bondholders down a path? He's giving them $20 mil now, with a big string attached, 'he noted the initial fee may have to be returned'. He gave 'em a taste, but may snatch it back. They don't get anything else till it's done. 'That money doesn't go out the door...until we get over the hurdle...' carrot in front of their nose. They still might not get the fees: Just what does 'a little high' mean. The rest of the judges' comments seem, to me, to put this where it has always been: On the valuation of the company.
Sooo, unless al' da chilin's gonna come 'unner da arch, smilin', clap'in, hol'in hands all hap'y an glad....Mon'ay d'eys gonna hab d'ere own piles a rocks an' all sta' t'rowin' hard. An' did'n judge, he say d'ey don' win d'ey look toward whuppin'?
Hasn't that been his stance since the hearing in May? Either you boys find a way to agree on this or fight? And the 1st plan we're going to deal with is this plan, or one of its' direct sons?
So aren't we where he said this was going in May?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
