News Focus
News Focus
icon url

brightness

06/15/10 1:09 AM

#654152 RE: Alex G #654149

Nah. I have been consistently taking the position that the spill is an environmental disaster in the short-run, most significantly to the tourist industry. If we had private ownership of parcels of the gulf sea floor, the owner would never have allowed BP to do what it did; it's the government that allowed BP to take those high risk activities, with a government imposed damage cap of $75million per incident, a figure probably entered prominently into the bean counters' calculations on just how little precaution they had to take.

In the long run, yes, the spill will be a non-issue in terms of damage to the environment. The impact on business and home owners in that region however would be different story if debt payments are missed.
icon url

Taxmantoo

06/15/10 8:03 AM

#654180 RE: Alex G #654149

My problem with that is the loss of 'fixed sealife'.

Living reef organisms, especially coral, recover very slowly. Coral harvested for souvenir and aquarium purposes is a major problem, an entire coral reef flooded with crude would be a calamity. You can reseed the coral after the oil is gone, but we won't see recovery in my lifetime, it just plain grows too slow.