News Focus
News Focus
icon url

RichieBoy

06/13/10 1:51 AM

#143088 RE: B*A*N*K*E*R #143085

B*A*N*K*E*R thank you for the clarification on MS technology

I felt certain no one in there right mind would neglect patenting such a useful and humanitarian technology and vaguely recalled this thread already confirming the patent(s) for longs at that time. Obviously we have many more new longs now keen to get the story straight and so they should. So from a DD standpoint for newbies and others I think it is still worth Dean visiting this topic in the next CC if only to set the facts straight on patents.

Third hand information can be dangerous (no offense) but , I feel certain the military must also be interested in this technology if they are not using it already, for operations in theater and places like say Iraq. Which raises the question is the US military using (or benefiting from) the MineSeeker Technology for offensive missions eg. in Afghanistan where IED's grow like potatoes...

Perhaps Dean ought to visit both questions but frankly I'm not convinced he can because of confidentiality reasons, particularly with regards to the military applications if they do for a fact exist. MHO

RichieBoy
icon url

solar fusion

06/13/10 12:04 PM

#143118 RE: B*A*N*K*E*R #143085

Talking about Mineseeker, you said:

It is also my belief that not even dean has any idea how fast this will grow and how much good will be created by this little venture we have "stumbled" into.

I agree 100%. However, I am particularly concerned about WHEN this operation is going to be profitable. Is it 6 moths, 1 year, 2 years? It certainly isn't June 30, 2010.

All IMO, of course.
icon url

DOLLARLAND

06/13/10 8:22 PM

#143197 RE: B*A*N*K*E*R #143085

I sense that it has all been about Mineseeker from the beginning. This land mine issue was something Dean had a passion for, and building a company in this manner will create the opportunity to fund the cause.