yes, I went back to read the offending PR and it never said that ACLH got a contract from BP - it specifically stated that ANCON Marine was submitting ACT fluidizer for testing. Looks to me that the SEC is the one misstating things, but they have the power over us.
also, do you all think that another company (M--N) which just supposedly received a contract from BP would have any effect on ACLH opening. This company (M--N) is stop signed and has no financial info whatsoever. IMO, before the suspension, we had current info on the pink sheets so maybe that will put us in a better position... any thoughts here?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
