Replies to post #99815 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[F6]

n4807g -- so the dogma provideth, so shall it ever be repeated

whether or not the dogma be entirely applicable, and whether or not in context the application of the dogma shall entirely make sense

such matter not to the dogma, and shall matter neither to ye

[StephanieVanbryce]

because it isn't a jobs bill, it's an increase debt and spend bill, there's a difference. When the spending ends, so do the jobs.

Where does state local & federal revenue come from ?

[wbmw]

When the spending ends, so do the jobs.

You're living in a dream world if you think job creation comes for free.

Obama can't shake the magic wand any harder, bro. There's only one recipe for creating a job, and that's to vote on providing the money for a project that will pay the person's salary.

A "Jobs Bill" means a package of stimulus money that goes towards projects that employ people, and when Congress votes on it, no one is under the false impression that a job can somehow be created without deficit spending.

What was your idea again? Oh yeah, the Payroll Tax Holiday.

'n4807g' says:

1. Must create jobs
2. Must cut spending

Forgetting for a second that both are contradictory, your "solution" manages to somehow violate both of the tenents you repeat here ad nausium, since relieving *existing* employed persons of their tax obligations manages to create exactly *zero* new jobs, and at the same time it increases the deficit through lower revenues. Absolutely "brilliant" idea. Got any others?