News Focus
News Focus
icon url

DlphcOracl

01/11/05 9:59 PM

#344338 RE: Zeev Hed #344332

Zeev: I think INTC opened Door #1. They were....

...more upbeat and positive on their business prospects for the remainder of the year than I had anticipated. It will be interesting to see how the market reacts to what I consider to be positive news from INTC. If the market has a muted response or continues its decline for the remainder of the week, this will raise a large cautionary flag for me.

Investor and Wall St. sentiment has been overly optimistic and a market that does not respond to "good" news is a warning (to me, anyway) that the underlying investor optimism and increased risk tolerance that has propelled the market for the last 18 months may be reversing itself.

Caveat emptor.
icon url

TexasTech

01/11/05 10:30 PM

#344345 RE: Zeev Hed #344332

Hi Zeev:

Happy New Year!!!! It looks like a new day has dawned in Israel and there is hope for the future. Good for your people!!!

Anyhow, I'd like to talk about another stock I'm interested in. I brought NFI http://www.nfi-info.net/ to you at a price of $30 a share back in May 04 and the stock ran to $58 of late. I hope some of the stellar swing traders that read your thread participated and if they didn't I'd like to suggest a look see at Sonus Networks (SONS). They've just partnered with Samsung in the VOIP arena and already do business with Verizon and ATT and others.

I apologize if this subject has already been discussed here as I don't have time to read the thread. I've been blessed with a windfall of profits this year and have contributed to the Tsunami relief I suggest contributing here http://www.lds.org/ldsfoundation/welfare/welcome/0,7133,1325-1-9,00.html where you know large amounts of money won't be diverted to large CEO pension funds and the funds will be honestly disbursed

God Bless you Zeev and I wish you a fruitful 2005,

TT
icon url

TexasTech

01/11/05 11:06 PM

#344352 RE: Zeev Hed #344332

Zeev:

Do you monitor your thread? I've found you to be quite the gentleman.? Are there requirements for posting here as to etiquette

God Bless,

TT
icon url

simple

01/11/05 11:34 PM

#344362 RE: Zeev Hed #344332

Mobile phones tumour risk to young children
BY SAM COATES, NIGEL HAWKES AND ALEXANDRA BLAIR
January 12, 2005 www.timesonline.co.uk

CHILDREN under the age of eight should not use mobile phones, parents were advised last night after an authoritative report linked heavy use to ear and brain tumours and concluded that the risks had been underestimated by most scientists.
Professor Sir William Stewart, chairman of the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB), said that evidence of potentially harmful effects had become more persuasive over the past five years.

The news prompted calls for phones to carry health warnings and panic in parts of the industry. One British manufacturer immediately suspended a model aimed at four to eight-year-olds.
The number of mobiles in Britain has doubled to 50 million since the first government-sponsored report in 2000. The number of children aged between five and nine using mobiles has increased fivefold in the same period.
In his report, Mobile Phones and Health, Sir William said that four studies have caused concern. One ten-year study in Sweden suggests that heavy mobile users are more prone to non-malignant tumours in the ear and brain while a Dutch study had suggested changes in cognitive function. A German study has hinted at an increase in cancer around base stations, while a project supported by the EU had shown evidence of cell damage from fields typical of those of mobile phones.
“All of these studies have yet to be replicated and are of varying quality but we can’t dismiss them out of hand,” Sir William said. If there was a health risk — which remained unproven — it would have a greater effect on the young than on older people, he added.
For children aged between 8 and 14, parents had to make their own judgments about the risks and benefits. “I can’t believe that for three to eight year-olds they can be readily justified,” he said.
David Hart, general secretary of the National Association of Headteachers, called last night for a ban on mobiles in schools.
Mobile phone companies reacted furiously, saying that the report fanned public concern without presenting new research. The youth market is highly lucrative because teenagers are more likely to use video downloads and other services.
The World Health Organisation is preparing to publish an international report, drawing on hundreds of studies conducted over a decade, which many hope will give a definitive judgment on mobile phone safety.
The board’s report says that while there is a lack of hard information of damage to health, the approach should be precautionary. Sir William said: “Just because there are 50 million of them out there doesn’t mean they are absolutely safe.”
One school in the North East has begun using mobile scanners to prevent pupils using mobiles in class. “Outside college hours it is up to parents, but in our care if mobiles are found on children, they are confiscated and returned to the parents,” David Riden, vice principal of Tollbar Business and Enterprise College in New Waltham, said.
One group that appears to target young users is Richard Branson’s Virgin Mobile, which derives much of its revenue from the 16s-35s market. It denies targeting under 16s but has cornered a large slice of the youth market with cheap voice and text messages.
HEALTH RISK
• Acoustic neuromas are benign tumours of the acoustic nerve
• A study in Sweden has shown that they are twice as common in mobile phone users
icon url

Barry

01/12/05 12:07 AM

#344365 RE: Zeev Hed #344332

Rambus appoints Harold Hughes CEO. Tate becomes chairman of the board. Just FYI as I know you have some shares of the bu$$.
I'm always out here reading and enjoying your commentary. Keep up the good work.
icon url

Ace Hanlon

01/12/05 6:20 AM

#344387 RE: Zeev Hed #344332

Ten problems for 2005


January 11, 2005


 Lawrence Schnurmacher is executive director/investments, private client division, for a national brokerage firm.


 


1. The rubber will finally hit the road for the automobile manufacturers as well as automobile retailers and auto part suppliers.  During a historically difficult economic growth environment, automobile manufacturers have "magically" induced the American public to "buy" their new vehicles at a pace which just a few years ago was thought to be impossible.  The problem with the sales activity is that many, if not most, of the sales were encouraged and facilitated through financing that left much of the risk on the seller's balance sheet.  The manufacturers basically allowed consumers to get their cars for "little or no money down," in some cases with no payments for 3-6 months, while accepting favorable financing terms (for the buyers) and extracting no collateral to do so.  In addition, the manufacturers continued to produce vehicles at a pace that created a glut of new cars that last longer and have better warranties than previous production ramps ups.  This has created a situation where we now have the "youngest" and potentially longest "life span" vehicles on the road than ever before.  Used car values have dropped substantially, and in the next few years many consumers will own their vehicles "free and clear" and will have little or no incentive to buy a new car.

The real "bogey man" for the automobile manufacturers may come in the form of credit defaults.  During this period of peak sales, those sales have become harder and harder to come by, and the sellers have become more and more lenient with credit approvals.  Those two factors were a terrible combination for Sears a few years ago, and I foresee a similar problem for the lending arms of the major automobile manufacturers.  Finally, as sales slow, the earnings from the financing divisions will drop.  While the sales trends have been artificially propped up by incentives and creative financing deals, the bulk of the auto manufacturers' earnings over the past three years have come from the financing of the vehicles. Some 50-75% of profits came from the financing divisions of Ford and General Motors.  Slower sales will necessitate difficult production cuts that could last for 12-24 months.  The combination of production cuts, lower earnings from the financing arms, and higher credit defaults could produce a very difficult economic reality for the automobile industry.


 


 


2) Higher Interest rates will matter and will have a negative impact on many consumer areas, but most significantly on the over-heated HOUSING market.   The marginal buyer who was given the gift of low interest rates, an easy lending environment, and lax appraisal process for the last three years will now encounter the reality that a home purchase is "the biggest and most important purchase of your life."  Carry costs will become unmanageable, ARM's will adjust higher and raise mortgage payments, and any economic difficulty or career disruption will result in a problem.  For new buyers, the mortgage application/approval process, along with the valuation/appraisal process, will become more stringent and less forgiving.  The refinance activity that helped to support homeowners with carry costs, upkeep, and home improvements will slow with higher rates and more stable or falling home values.  Homeowners will struggle to deal with higher rates on adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) and will find it difficult to extract any new cash from their homes.   Low interest rates that fueled strong sales of new and existing homes will be a distant memory, and further increases in home sales and prices will become harder and harder to achieve. 


 


Homebuilders that have continued to forecast unabated sales growth, and have built inventory of spec homes and acquired land for future building, will find a more difficult pricing environment and a less than able consumer.  And remember the one about "three hikes and a stumble" and "don't fight the FED"? Well, how about "five hikes and a wipeout" and "don't forget that stocks usually go down when rates go up"!


 


 


3) Refinance activity will slow dramatically.  This will happen due to higher interest rates and a slowdown in the appreciation of real estate values.   Other factors will converge to reverse a huge increase in lending activity which occurred, in part, due to lower rates and large increases in values of real estate.  The combination  of those two factors, along with higher demand, creative financing, easy credit process, and lax appraisal processes, allowed for a huge "extraction" of capital from hard assets which was subsequently "spent" by consumers to maintain their living standards.  These trends are likely to reverse, and credits will be strained.  Lenders including banks, credit card companies, mortgage lenders, automobile lenders, store branded credit card lenders, furniture lenders, will experience a decline in credit worthiness of borrowers/buyers that will lead to a rise in credit defaults and lower sales volumes due to fewer qualified borrowers/buyers. 


 


Prime and sub-prime lenders will be hit with a "double whammy" in the form of lower sales/transactions/servicing fees and higher default rates which will lead to large write-offs.  A third impact will be higher expenses as they will have too many employees and overhead to handle the lower levels of business volume.  Clearly the sub-prime lenders would suffer severely from a slowdown in mortgage lending activity and an increase in default rates on loans to the somewhat less than credit worthy borrowers.  Others to experience this "pain" could include companies that have benefited greatly from the mortgage refinance boom of the last few years. 


 


4) The US consumer will finally run out of money  &/or credit  causing  retail sales  to slow significantly.  Consumer retail darlings will suffer sales declines and will be forced to close rather than open new store locations.  Clothing, furniture, auto, electronic, jewelry, and home improvement companies will all experience this slowdown.  If the retailer relies on easy credit and/or a frivolous consumer, it will face challenges in 2005.  


 


5) GOLD and other metals such as silver, platinum, copper, aluminum, etc. will reach new highs as the US dollar continues to erode and demand from Chinacontinues. Implications are hard to predict, yet it seems pretty clear that foreigners may limit or stop investing in US dollar priced assets, and may limit or stop lending money to the US Government, thus hurting spending and causing rates to rise.  Metals price increases will hurt manufacturing and cause renewed interest in storing capital in "hard assets" such as Gold and Silver.  Any type of serious geopolitical "upset", i.e. major terrorist attack, would also cause a surge in the price of Gold.


 


6) Fannie Mae will falter and create a significant credit crisis for the mortgage market.  The SEC, Justice Department, NYSE, and governmental scrutiny will all prove to be "too little too late" for equity shareholders and for some bond holders, as shortfalls in capital and internal controls will be uncovered, revealed, and  will pose a meaningful systematic risk for the overall market.  My guess is that the newly placed CEO and management of the company will blame the highly computerized qualification process, new computerized credit scoring systems and approval processes, and lack of internal controls at lower levels for the foul ups. The Federal government will in some way "come to the rescue" of this "too big to fail" entity, for the greater good, but the shareholders equity will be greatly diminished in the process.


  


7) Energy prices will resume the uptrend and will reach new highs at the levels that many analysts and economists say will create an OIL CRISIS. I think there is a 50/50 chance of a supply disruption caused by terrorism, natural disaster, or OPEC "problems," which would not only cause prices to rise dramatically, but would cause other problems for the economy as well.  Many industries that rely on energy to make their products will suffer margin compression as costs rise and competition will pressure selling prices.


  


8) The iPod will prove to be the latest example of a great idea/gadget that "flashes" in the pan.  Even as the "gift of the year" this past holiday season, I believe that competition and new product offerings will prove too much for the iPod to handle.  Sales of the popular and colorful MP3 player will flag and will not create new interest in the Apple computer hardware or Macintosh operating system.  Recent history is full of what I call "cool but worthless" products.  The most recent example is the Palm Pilot, which continues to be a great product and very useful, yet once it was mass produced by every electronic manufacturer and the prices fell while inventories increased, the future profitability disappeared.  Another "cool but useless" gadget is the picture phone, which is fun and cool for the first month the consumer has it, but thereafter is just a novelty that is rarely used by the cell phone customer, and such phones will ultimately not earn phone manufacturers higher margins. 


 


The iPod is the latest example of a glorified gadget.  It is no more than a "fancy" MP3 player that does way too much, holds way too much, and costs way too much.  Many formidable competitors have entered the fray to sell MP3 gadgets to the insatiable American consumer, and the result will likely be a similar demise in prices and profitability as the Palm Pilot and picture phone suffered, as well as a decline in iPod demand.


  


9) The War in Iraq, being sold to the American public as an important front on the War on Terror will spin totally out of control.  The Coalition forces will endure more casualties and deaths than in the previous years, and I predict that they will be hit with a "catastrophic" attack resulting in the loss of hundreds of troops.  An attack similar to the Beirut Barracks Bombing that was the beginning of the US exit from Lebanon.  If this does happen, the American public will revolt against the war in Iraq, and the President and his administration will be forced to withdraw troops and turn over Iraq to Iraqi control.  I think that there is a 50/50 chance of a terror attack in the US which would result in a renewed sense of fear in the general public and a lack of confidence in the governments efforts to protect the US from terror, despite all the money spent and the efforts put forth to do so.


  


10) The above confluence of events will result in a very bad trading environment for US equities and will create an environment where investors will continuously be disappointed with geopolitical events.  Bad news will dominate the headlines and news crawls.  Business and economic news will suffer.  Business leaders will retrench again and will resist hiring new workers and will cut back on capital spending until a more stable world is evidence.  This will result in lower equity prices and I think the major indexes will give back all of the gains of the last 2 years.  


 


I continue to believe that we are in a long-term period of economic decline.  I see the last few years, since 2000, and the next few years, till say 2008-2010, as the 2nd Great Depression for the majority of the US population, especially the rapidly growing middle and lower class.  As with most things, financial well-being and economic prosperity are "relative" and relative to past economic periods, the current state of our economy and the future economic outlook is at best "relatively" dismal. Unfortunately the baby boomers  are unprepared for this economic reality, and the government  is  totally unprepared to take care of them .   As the "greatest generation" lives longer than any of its ancestors, the economic reality of huge healthcare costs, lack of employment opportunity, lack of savings, and high costs of living will create a very difficult period of time for this huge swath of the population during their "golden years."