News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Tuff-Stuff

05/31/10 6:21 PM

#321574 RE: Tuff-Stuff #321573

bl<>Thailand’s Tarisa May Hold Rate as Political Chaos Hurts Growth


By Suttinee Yuvejwattana and Michael Munoz

June 1 (Bloomberg) -- Thailand’s central bank may keep its benchmark interest rate at the lowest level since July 2004 after the nation’s deadliest political violence in almost two decades undermined economic growth.

Bank of Thailand Governor Tarisa Watanagase will leave the one-day bond repurchase rate unchanged at 1.25 percent for a ninth meeting, according to all 11 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News. The decision is due at 2:30 p.m. in Bangkok tomorrow.

Thailand has refrained from joining Malaysia, India and Australia in raising borrowing costs this year even as a rebound in exports helped the economy expand the most in 15 years last quarter. Growth will be “strongly affected” in the three months through June after weeks of anti-government protests led to riots and left more than 80 people dead, Tarisa said May 26.

“While we believe the central bank is still keen to raise interest rates to a more neutral level, this will require a more stable political backdrop,” said Usara Wilaipich, an economist at Standard Chartered Plc in Bangkok. “The situation now remains fluid. The first-quarter recovery momentum is also expected to fade rapidly in the second quarter as the impact from political chaos kicked in.”

Standard Chartered pushed back its forecast for a rate increase tomorrow to the fourth quarter after rioting erupted across Bangkok on May 19 as Thai security forces cleared an anti-government protest camp and forced the group’s leaders to surrender.

Riots, Arson

About 16 people died that day and more than 30 buildings were set alight, including the Stock Exchange of Thailand, a shopping complex owned by Central Pattana Pcl and at least eight branches of Bangkok Bank Pcl. About one third of the Southeast Asian nation was under a curfew last week even as the demonstrations ended.

Southeast Asia’s largest economy after Indonesia grew 12 percent in the first three months of 2010 as exports, investment and consumption recovered after a recession last year. Still, the National Economic & Social Development Board refrained from raising its forecast for an increase of as much as 4.5 percent in gross domestic product this year after the first-quarter report, saying GDP may shrink in the second half if the political unrest can’t be resolved.

Finance Minister Korn Chatikavanij said last month the economy will be “less rosy” from the second quarter onwards, and the government estimates the unrest may cost Thailand as much as 145 billion baht ($4.46 billion) and reduce growth by 1.1 percentage points.

Inflation Benign

Inflation has stayed below 4 percent in Thailand, where Toyota Motor Corp. and General Motors Co. have factories, giving the central bank room to keep borrowing costs low. Consumer prices rose 3 percent from a year earlier in April after climbing 3.4 percent in March, while core inflation, which excludes fresh food and fuel prices, rose 0.5 percent.

The central bank forecasts inflation will accelerate to as much as 4.8 percent this year on rising oil prices and a recovering economy. Core inflation, which it uses to guide policy, may average as much as 2 percent this year, the Bank of Thailand said in April.

Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva vowed on May 21 to “rebuild the house” through a reconciliation plan that includes addressing economic disparities and rewriting political rules. The government plans to spend about a third of its 2.07 trillion baht budget next year on measures to narrow a divide between rich and poor that fueled the protests, Abhisit said May 26.

“Protests have ended for now, but political conflicts remain,” Standard Chartered’s Usara said. “This political backdrop clouds Thailand’s economic outlook for the months ahead.”
icon url

HoosierHoagie

05/31/10 6:21 PM

#321575 RE: Tuff-Stuff #321573

BP and the Union Foot on Obama's Neck

by Lurita Doan

Elizabeth Birnbaum, Director of Minerals Management (MMS) at the Department of the Interior, resigned over the BP spill, in a classic, sacrifice-a-pawn, let-the-heads-roll, political sacrificial lamb ploy that folks in DC have witnessed countless times. Someone had to go. Anger over Obama Administration inaction, coupled with recent disclosures that government employees in the Department of Interior’s MMS division were often watching porn and taking drugs, demanded a head. So, the call went out, and Birnbaum was the sacrificial pawn.



President Obama probably hopes that much of the blame for the poor government response will stick to Birnbaum, whom he implied was responsible for the unprofessional conduct of government employees in the Department of Interior that contributed to the disaster. There’s lots of blame to go around and many examples of irresponsibility and poor decisions within the government.

Still, blaming all on Birnbaum is unfair. Birnbaum knew that there were serious government employee performance problems within MMS with employees caught viewing pornography on government computers, using crystal methamphetamines prior to work and potentially falsified oil rig inspection reports . I bet she even wanted to discipline these employees but was thwarted by the strong protections enjoyed by unionized federal civil servants, where firing a federal employee in one of the many powerful Labor Unions is almost impossible.

Firing a unionized, poorly-performing federal employee is made even more difficult by the Obama Administration's pro-union tilt and by their decision to support the agenda of big Labor. Elizabeth Birnbaum may have wanted to axe the federal employees watching porn and taking drugs, but first, she'd have to battle the powerful Labor Unions that have constructed a protective cocoon around all unionized employees. Does anyone think that the White House would have allowed that? No Way.

Years ago, George H.W. Bush tried to push reforms to make it easier to dismiss federal employees for gross incompetence. He tried to push for random drug tests. Ironically, the local AFGE #3457, one of the unions that represents the Gulf of Mexico-based workers of MMS, argued, that government insistence upon random drug testing was a violation of worker rights. Even in the event of a finding, the union worker would have the right to “grieve’ and protest firing in a four step process, which takes, at a minimum, 72 days during which time the government union employee cannot be penalized until the arbitration is completed.

President Obama may hope to divert attention to the idea that MMS employees were poorly led and locked in a cozy relationship with the oil industry. Just don’t expect him to admit that labor unions, representing federal employees, would not have easily allowed the firing any of the MMS employees.

Obama has strengthened the power of labor unions representing federal employees. If there is a “boot on anyone’s neck”, it’s the boot of unionized labor on the neck of the Obama Administration with a union finger in every pie. In deed and word, the Obama Administration has shown favoritism for unions. Obama appointed the head of the SEIU to a White House Advisory position, putting the fox directly in the hen house. A close look at many of Obama’s appointees, from Secretary Hilda Solis to Car Czar, Ron Bloom, demonstrates the unusually strong union influence on the Obama Administration. These are not folks who are going to make a stand on behalf of the American people and rock the union boat by reprimanding and punishing union employees.

So where does this leave things? That depends. If the BP oil spill is capped soon, then public attention, can be diverted by the inevitable barrage of litigation that will ensue, and the union employees, whose egregious behavior caused their leader to step down, will be quietly reassigned to other divisions, and get off with a wrist-slapping.

On the other hand, if the Administration continues its ineffective and slow response to the BP disaster, then public ire will require more action and new pawns may need to be sacrificed to protect the White House from further criticisms. Obama will likely criticize BP, the oil Industry, and certainly George Bush. What the White House will not do is hold accountable onionized federal employees that have performed poorly.

Obama has empowered the unions to believe that they are a special class of employee, with special considerations and special privileges. Obama has reinforced the belief that unionized federal employees have a right to higher pay, ever expanding benefits, and should not be held accountable for poor performance. This might be a well-tested campaign strategy to help the White House in coming elections, but it is disastrous policy for America.

http://townhall.com/columnists/LuritaDoan/2010/05/31/bp_and_the_union_foot_on_obamas_neck