News Focus
News Focus
icon url

vinovista

05/31/10 11:19 AM

#17422 RE: kimble1 #17421

Do you know what the radiation output of the DVis is rated at? Also do you know that radiation levels drop off logarithmically at 6 feet? Portable Xrays are taken all the time in pt rooms, ER and ICU without lead walls or lead screens. Everybody is asked to move away and the tech throws on a lead vest because they are the closest. An announcement is made that an Xray is being made and to move away. All efforts are made to reduce exposure. If you are more than 6' away your exposure is minimal(not zero). I work in a Cath Lab every day and this information is from our Radiation exposure inservice. Personally I can't wait for the DVis to be approved and installed in our labs. I'll probably be retired before it happens. Why? Because I'll be paying of my mortgage from this stock and retiring to make wine.
icon url

King Shaka

05/31/10 1:43 PM

#17424 RE: kimble1 #17421

Maybe common sense isn't common at all.

Posted by: kimble1 Date: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 12:33:25 PM
In reply to: Chemic76spirit who wrote msg# 11638 Post # of 17423

I would like to know....is the PMA issue resolved once and for all (i beleive it is) but i would like Dean to say it again

I would also like him to give us the names of the Radiologists who are working on the review

kimble

How many shares did you have when you posted this and how many do you have today?

TIA

SHAKA
icon url

wallstreetgenuis

05/31/10 7:45 PM

#17435 RE: kimble1 #17421

kimble1, PMA route paranoia is non-sense.
Here are proofs that equivalent equipments were submitted to FDA using 510k route and were approved. Read the description of these machine on the links provided below, they are almost exactly the same with DVIS
1)First:
Manufacturer:Breakaway Imaging LLC
Product Name: O-Arm Imaging System
Distributor:Medtronic
Link to FDA 510K:
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf5/K050996.pdf

Link to machine in Action: http://www.neurocirugia.com/instrumental/index.php?entry=entry071029-121953

2)Second:The above O-Arm Imaging System was approved because it is substantially equivalent to Siemens SireMobil Iso-C 3D,which is a C-Arm fluroscopy imaging system.
Link to FDA 510K: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf4/K040347.pdf
Link to machine in Action: http://www.medical.siemens.com/siemens/zh_CN/gg_spms_FBAs/files/brochures/siremobil_isoc_3d_broch_e.pdf

A couple of C-Arm fluoroscopy imaging machines from GE,Philips,Ziehm,Toshiba are substantially equivalent to DVIS because
DVIS is using the same x-ray unit components that are FDA approved and that are being used in most commercially available C-Arm fluoroscopy imaging machine.
The only difference between the C-Arm and O-Arm imaging system is the available angle of position to take a shot on the patient. 360 degrees versus 180 degrees.