Replies to post #15382 on Act Clean Technologies Inc. (fka ACLH)

[cc2cr]

Listen to the Radio show from Tuesday. Prior to aclh being on, the moderator /host Bill Chippas talk about covering his shorts the last few days, then he sets Kidder up with the surprise of the trading halt.
Look at Chippas pedigree and past connections to the market.
Seemed odd to me, I was not aware that they were doing a radio spot and all of a sudden aclh is on Chippas show. Who contacted who to be on the show?

[seaghost]

Looks like they are using, or making an example of, ACLH to impress the president or something ref. mess 15374. Who knows what is true? everybody is taking action but nobody knows anything for sure.

All I know is a lot of good people here are screwed and by one or by two it still turns out we are screwed.

[brosef]

WHY did the SEC target
these guys. They didn't protect my investment. Maybe they protected short investments.

Well from what I can gather; the SEC doesn't do much to help CURRENT investors,probably because you assumed the risk when you put your money down, and the outcome or new rules that may be applied after an investigation are directed towards helping FUTURE investors.(I think I'm right. Am I wrong?)

My guesses as to why ACLH was pulled...

1.Huge disaster/lots of attention/More potential for fraud means more eyes locked onto questionable claims/PR's.

2.BP...,if I was an unknown broke pinksheet stock, trying to sell some paper, the last thing I would do is pull a bunch of well known companies to back up my profile without having any evidence of prior provided services or involvement to show...but... that's just me.(this should be my #1)

3. If either of the above doesn't sway you, well,you can always fall back on alphabetical order.

I thought MOPN would be first, but let's see if #3 works out.