Replies to post #33065 on NanoViricides Inc (NNVC)

[TheBunny]

>>If Eva has some results on June 6th, what does that say about the many many months we have been waiting for results on prior tests? <<

Ovi, If you were attentive you would have clearly seen that the Eva deal was completely different than the one's with the other institutions.
Eva is 'Dengue'. Reviewing the preliminary test protocols already available from NNVC, she jumped right on it. Did the tests. The results are done and being broken down in a form where they can be understood by a non scientific reader. Then that translation has to be resent and agreed by all parties that it is indeed accurate. From there, the main portions of the text are picked and and used to form the Press Release.
With all the other Institutions they were a 'freebee' to NNVC outside of the actutal formulation. As a 'freebee' quess where they get in line compared to the paying customers?

That's the way I see it.


-Bunny-

[Ubertino]

Keep the best for Eva - that's the way I'd do it!

Berkeley eh - impress the living daylights out of everybody including the unbelievers but mostly the FDA.

We shall see. A new day is dawning on June 6th - aka D-Day.

[Echo20]

Ovidius,

Like the Shelf Registration
and the many testing locations now going on?

Like the money set up until 2011?

NNVC tends to move slower than expected but it does seem to meet
all of its intended targets.
At least over the last four to five years.

Echo20