InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

scion

05/10/10 3:30 PM

#301705 RE: janice shell #301704

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions to be heard on July 8, 2010 are scheduled on a peremptory basis and will proceed as follows:

All written materials, evidence and legal submissions the Respondents intend to rely on at the contemplated motions will be filed by the Respondents by 5:00pm on June 24, 2010;

Any Responding materials from Staff will be filed by 5:00pm on July 2, 2010;

In the event that the Respondents decide not to bring any pre-hearing motions, they shall inform the office of the Secretary, as well as Staff, on or before June 24, 2010, so the date may be vacated;

If the Respondents fail to file their motion materials by June 24, 2010, at 5:00pm the motion date shall be vacated; and,

The motions shall proceed whether or not the Respondents have retained counsel by July 8, 2010.

DATED at Toronto this 7th day of May, 2010.
icon url

TheFraudStopper

05/10/10 3:47 PM

#301707 RE: janice shell #301704

If the Respondents fail to file their motion materials by June 24, 2010, at 5:00pm the motion date shall be vacated; and,
The motions shall proceed whether or not the Respondents have retained counsel by July 8, 2010.


About Bleeding time!!! Now that the OSC has said that PV et al cannot use the "we don't have a lawyer" excuse to play the delay game any more, I wonder what PV will do?

Then there is the following excerpt:

they wished to raise certain pre-hearing motions including asserting solicitor and client privilege over the anticipated testimony of certain witnesses

It sure looks like at least one of PV's former lawyers has been providing information to the OSC.

This could get interesting

Any way you cut it though, the walls are starting to close in around PV et al - which is a very good thing. It really is unfortunate that justice seems to move at a geological pace.
icon url

Ripnrob

05/10/10 4:18 PM

#301710 RE: janice shell #301704

I sense...tears in elmira...LOL