blemontx wrote, in reply to #2069 (how negativity harms us): "So the moral to your story is to avoid any and all investor disclosure about TATF, except positive stuff, regardless of how suspicious and irresponsible and possibly fraudulent that company's behavior...."
I wrote nothing of the kind. Please don't put words in my mouth.
blemontx continued: "... You made way too big a reach in your arguments in your latest post."
That's it? That's your complete refutation of what I wrote? Do you really believe your response constitutes any kind of convincing argument for why what I wrote is "way too big a reach?"