Replies to post #21438 on Washington Mutual Preferred fka WAMPQ

[sidedraft]

No, and how could Walrath even mention them if they are not apart of the record in her court?

I assume that you are looking at this part of her ruling?

First it’s clear to me that this debtor has been investigated to death and I’m sure that even the most experienced and talented examiner that the UST could appoint would not “find any stone unturned.” Investigations have been conducted not only by the debtor and creditors committee, but by the EC itself has done some investigation, the OTS, FDIC, Government Task Force (including the US Attorney for the Western District of WA, Dept of labor, the Dept of Justice, FBI, IRS, SEC, AG of NY, Class Action Plaintiff, Congress, The Us Treasury, and the Presidents Financial Fraud Task Force) they’ve all taken a look at WAMU,

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=49823842

She seem to be using information that she has gathered, maybe by watching the evening news, maybe by chatting over dinner, but I am not aware of the results of all those mentioned investigation's results being on the record, in her court, for this case.

Some would take her ruling as her declaring that no crime was committed here, when RICO should be the hot topic.