News Focus
News Focus
icon url

SteveF

04/20/10 10:05 AM

#38484 RE: Zardiw #38477

That's not to say he couldn't LICENSE the process though.

I've been asking for months why JBII doesn't license the process and catalyst to generate immediate revenue. It makes much more sense than competing in the P2O business with zero experience, unless the plan is to get rich selling stock.

The replies I got to that suggestion are pretty funny considering you are now in favor of it.

Posted by: zardiw Member Level Grandfathered Member Date: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 10:15:53 AM
In reply to: SteveF who wrote msg# 34935 Post # of 38482

LOL...the 'technology' is basically a big tank that you put plastic in and heat. It's not even patented...so what's the big deal on that?...z



Posted by: Rawnoc Member Level Date: Sunday, February 28, 2010 1:38:50 AM
In reply to: SteveF who wrote msg# 30630 Post # of 38483

Your logic is why not license something out for pennies on the dollar rather than keep all of the profit for himself and that`s the "logical" solution?

Sounds about as "logical" as a major dump coming on February 24 when a mythical share restriction is released.



Posted by: blueone Member Level Date: Sunday, February 28, 2010 1:27:50 AM
In reply to: SteveF who wrote msg# 30633 Post # of 38483

"You can license a patent to others who know how to use it and make beaucoup money..."

Yeah, I guess you are right... JB knows not what he's doing and should follow the lead of all the smart people on this board!

ROFL!