News Focus
News Focus
icon url

epsteinbd

09/07/02 4:27 PM

#23380 RE: Zeev Hed #23379

Very interesting, a bit surprising, rather convincing.

icon url

epsteinbd

09/07/02 4:38 PM

#23381 RE: Zeev Hed #23379

On third reading, it is scary too... unless one likes washing machines. To invest in, that is. And even then...

So, better fishing lines than fishing bottoms ?

icon url

whitelake

09/07/02 5:17 PM

#23384 RE: Zeev Hed #23379

Zeev,"Finally, last week we saw the smallest number of issues traded on the NASDAQ since January of 1984! The number of issues peaked at 6136 in December of 1996 and has been slowly declining since then to the current 3984 issues. Over 2000 company names have merged, failed, moved to the NYSE or otherwise disappeared in six years!"
This is from Tom Veal's AIM newsletter of 8/26/02 http://www.aim-users.com/oldbbs.htm




whitelake


icon url

timtoinv

09/07/02 5:50 PM

#23386 RE: Zeev Hed #23379

That was an excellent post Zeev, where is Kayaker to file these? Thank you, tim

icon url

hiker

09/07/02 7:36 PM

#23393 RE: Zeev Hed #23379

Zeev,

Since Kayaker is no longer compiling a reference list of your posts (perhaps he got overwhelmed since he was listing so many!) would it not be helpful to you & your readers to have a small set of your key posts listed in the thread header?

I'm thinking of posts like the one this responds to, or the general forecast you wrote back in 2000, and perhaps a few other topics (perhaps OBs?).

Also - many thanks for being so free in sharing your thoughts & expertise. I also think that your move to Ihub has proven to be a good one - this seems to be a much more constructive environment than the one at SI.

Best,

Hiker




icon url

wahz

09/07/02 7:52 PM

#23396 RE: Zeev Hed #23379

Thanks for your time Zeev. I think that nicely clarifies the big picture for now.

icon url

boggy

09/07/02 7:54 PM

#23397 RE: Zeev Hed #23379

Dear Zeev-

After reading your post about your outlook for the future of the markets, I wanted to share Richard Russell's recent thoughts:


<<<As for the stock market, we've just had the first 90% downside day. What this 90% day signifies is that the stock market is now open to, and readying itself for -- all-out panic.

I think where we are now is on track for the wide-open panic phase of this bear market. Note, I did not say a panic moment or a panic day, I said a panic phase. The panic phase could take a week or a few weeks or a few months.

Before the panic has ended, stocks will be knocked to their knees, consumers will be in shock, the housing bubble will have burst as will the auto-buying bubble, the July 23 lows will be history, and the "A" wave of this bear market will finally have come to an end.

When the panic phase ends, investors and speculators will be in shock, and the stock market will appear to be shattered -- torn apart, literally in pieces.

That will give us the most "sold-out" market in years. This sold out market will set the base for the corrective (upside) wave "B" of this bear market. The "B" wave should be an upside whopper, and it should carry well into next year. After this corrective "B" leg will come the final "C" leg -- but I'll talk about that when the time comes.

Question -- "Russell, why do you think the coming panic will be so severe?

Answer -- Ironically, the reason I believe it will be so severe is that it has been preceded by the largest load of misplaced bullishness, across-the-board denial, trash talk, and Wall Street baloney, that I have ever seen. It has been preceded by weeks and months of misguided optimism and ignorance concerning the meaning of the primary bear trend.

Instead of recognizing that this is a bear market and therefore preparing for major trouble, the US government has been spending its head off, states and cities have been running up huge deficits, business has loaded up on debt, and consumers have been buying as if a bull market is just starting.

All of this lays the groundwork for shock, surprise and horrendous losses. Frankly, I can't remember a situation like this in the half century that I've been watching markets>>>


If I am to compare his post to yours, I would assume that you both see a drop (Russell feels panic/washout) in the next 1-3 months followed by a cyclical bull (B phase) into 03 followed by the final bear bottom into the end of 2004-5.

Is this what you think? And do you feel that your position approximates Russell?

Please respond and Happy New Year!

icon url

otraque

09/07/02 8:27 PM

#23399 RE: Zeev Hed #23379

Zeev here is a chart i have never beheld before. Someone named Steve Williams went to a lot math calculations to make this chart. It is the DOW/DJIA historical chart ADJUSTED to factor in inflation. http://www.geocities.com/WallStreet/Exchange/9807/Charts/SP500/DJ1800Inf_20811.gif
Of note, with adjustments for inflation 1982 the beginning of the last secular bull market is lowest point on the downside of the trend aside from 1813. Max
icon url

oeo2oo

09/07/02 9:01 PM

#23405 RE: Zeev Hed #23379

Historical Yearly Record of Listed Companies

Zeev,

You wrote:
The 950 number assumes that the Naz bleeding of listed stocks (a horrendous 1500 to 2000 issues since March 2000, we had about 5300 listed stocks trading daily then and now we average about 3300 to 3500, if someone has better numbers on total Naz issues then and now, please step forward) will finally end here. Don't write off even lower bottoms for the Naz.

Hope this helps:


 
Number of Listed Companies
Yearly Comparison with NYSE and AMEX
Month NASDAQ NYSE Amex
1975 2,467 1,557 1,215
1976 2,456 1,576 1,161
1977 2,456 1,575 1,098
1978 2,475 1,581 1,004
1979 2,543 1,565 931
1980 2,894 1,570 892
1981 3,353 1,565 867
1982 3,264 1,562 834
1983 3,901 1,550 822
1984 4,097 1,543 792
1985 4,136 1,540 783
1986 4,417 1,573 796
1987 4,706 1,647 869
1988 4,451 1,681 896
1989 4,293 1,719 859
1990 4,132 1,769 859
1991 4,094 1,885 860
1992 4,113 2,089 814
1993 4,611 2,362 869
1994 4,902 2,570 824
1995 5,122 2,675 791
1996 5,556 2,907 751
1997 5,487 3,047 771
1998 5,068 3,114 770
2000 4,734 2,862 765
2001 4,109 2,798 691
2002 3,843 2,794 682

* Data through July 2002



oeo2oo
icon url

jdaasoc

09/07/02 9:33 PM

#23407 RE: Zeev Hed #23379

Naz seems to have lost some more


Data Set Date: Friday, September 06, 2002 9210 Active Companies

Criteria Results

1 Is In Set({Exchange},[NASD]) 3761
NYSE 2162
AMEX 522


icon url

Fletch

09/07/02 11:26 PM

#23412 RE: Zeev Hed #23379

Zeev,
Much thanks for your Turnip view of the future! There are many very smart people with opinions on what will happen and most want something for their views...............not Zeev. Most aren't as accurate either...............The best market board around.
Thanks again,
Fletch

PS The dollar still doing AOK for some reason. Let's see what Sunday night brings.

icon url

Ballistic

09/08/02 12:13 AM

#23414 RE: Zeev Hed #23379

Happy New Year, Zeev ........

read your commentary ..... fascinating .....

" but I dont see that number until we go through at least three cyclical bear markets within the secular bear market, we are ...."

a question .....
why 3 cyclical bears mkts ???.....
as oppose to 2 ..... ??

i apologize if u mentioned it before .....
but i dont seem to find the explanation ......

thanks for your insight .......

cya
david

icon url

Paul Shread

09/10/02 9:38 AM

#23865 RE: Zeev Hed #23379

Zeev,

>>after a mini secular bull market starting later this year (providing the Iraq situation is resolved) lasting for about 12 to 18 months.<<

This seems to be a change for the turnips - didn't they previously see the possibility of another leg down starting early next year?

Thanks.

Paul