Replies to post #62708 on Copper King Mining Corporation fka CPRKQ

[richard the Realtor]

With some of the disasters in this country envirormentally in the past. I can only image that any company in a mining state would have the EPA and all the other regulatory departments all over them like a cheap suit.

[Lucky_1]

Well, about the "compliant" tailings pond...we all know about that and the docs have been posted (here) showing tons of details about how we're not compliant. We also know the company is working on addressing these issues and have a plan (link provided below) that's been submitted to the DOGM.

To be honest, I wasn't talking about that. I was asking about your claim that the company is and I'll quote you - "Furthermore our kick ass mill operator has been letting the toxic tailings run out the back door." Maybe you were a little emotional when you posted and got carried away and forgot to say something along the lines of “Maybe” or “I think” but I’m sure other’s will interpret the statement as fact or that you know something here. Claims like this left unchecked, or shall I say uncorrected could turn potential investors away. Until this is proven I call B.S.

You wanted to know how much it'll cost to become environmentally compliant? Here is a REALLY good WAG - https://fs.ogm.utah.gov/FILES/MINERALS/PERMITS/001/M0010067/2010/Incoming/0008.pdf (pages 32-34)
(User name & password = ogmguest)

Also, look here for more details:
Operation Plan
106.9 Proposed Location and Size of Ore & Waste Stockpiles, Tailings Pond, and Discharges (page 17-18)

Reclamation Plan (pages 27-29)

Quotes of note:
“There will be no water storage/treatment ponds, nor any water discharges, associated with any aspect of this facility.” Page 18

“There would be no acid forming or deleterious material present at the site. Therefore, no deleterious or acid forming material would be left on-site.” Page 28

Hope this helps,

Lucky